PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZTA vs. TYL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AZTA vs. TYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZTA achieves a -33.04% return, which is significantly higher than TYL's -39.36% return. Over the past 10 years, AZTA has outperformed TYL with an annualized return of 7.67%, while TYL has yielded a comparatively lower 6.01% annualized return.


AZTA

1D
-4.46%
1M
10.36%
YTD
-33.04%
6M
-35.80%
1Y
-24.87%
3Y*
-20.11%
5Y*
-24.80%
10Y*
7.67%

TYL

1D
-1.31%
1M
-12.12%
YTD
-39.36%
6M
-40.80%
1Y
-51.69%
3Y*
-11.49%
5Y*
-9.10%
10Y*
6.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZTA vs. TYL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
-33.04%-33.48%-23.24%11.89%-43.54%52.62%63.07%62.06%11.20%42.03%
TYL
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
-39.36%-21.28%37.91%29.69%-40.07%23.24%45.50%61.46%4.95%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AZTA and TYL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 1995

0.30

The correlation between AZTA and TYL shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AZTA:

-$3.88

TYL:

$9.63

PS Ratio

AZTA:

1.71

TYL:

3.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

AZTA:

$596.57M

TYL:

$2.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AZTA:

$265.78M

TYL:

$1.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

AZTA:

-$106.54M

TYL:

$491.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Azenta, Inc.

Tyler Technologies, Inc.

Return for Risk

AZTA vs. TYL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZTA
AZTA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
AZTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZTA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AZTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZTA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TYL
TYL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZTA vs. TYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AZTATYLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.72

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

-0.94

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

-1.60

+0.71

AZTA vs. TYL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZTA Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is higher than the TYL Sharpe Ratio of -1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZTA and TYL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AZTA vs. TYL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZTA drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, roughly equal to the maximum TYL drawdown of -93.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTA and TYL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZTATYLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.12%

-93.50%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.94%

-55.00%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.27%

-57.44%

-18.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.08%

-57.44%

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.08%

-57.44%

-29.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.05%

-57.44%

-24.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.40%

-39.55%

-25.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.97%

32.25%

-4.28%

Volatility

AZTA vs. TYL - Volatility Comparison

Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) have volatilities of 11.92% and 12.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZTATYLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.92%

12.22%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.19%

32.83%

+19.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.98%

37.00%

+25.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.78%

31.80%

+19.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.48%

29.08%

+22.40%

Dividends

AZTA vs. TYL - Dividend Comparison

Neither AZTA nor TYL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%0.59%0.95%1.53%1.68%2.34%3.75%
TYL
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AZTA vs. TYL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Azenta, Inc. and Tyler Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
144.80M
613.50M
(AZTA) Total Revenue
(TYL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AZTA and TYL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TYL has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to AZTA (11.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZTA dropped -97.12% vs TYL's -93.50%.

AZTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZTA and TYL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer