AZO vs. CHPS
AZO (AutoZone, Inc.) is a stock, while CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Over the past year, AZO returned -17.09% vs 211.40% for CHPS. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AZO vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZO achieves a -9.13% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 103.69% return.
AZO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -12.96%
- YTD
- -9.13%
- 6M
- -19.75%
- 1Y
- -17.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 17.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
CHPS
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 23.46%
- YTD
- 103.69%
- 6M
- 107.58%
- 1Y
- 211.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AZO vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | -9.13% | 5.92% | 23.84% | 1.87% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 103.69% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZO and CHPS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.04 |
The correlation between AZO and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZO vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
AZO
CHPS
AZO vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.78 | -0.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 12.16 | -12.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 47.22 | -48.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 6.17 | -6.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.77 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
AZO vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZO drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZO and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.32% | -39.44% | -6.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.59% | -17.50% | -15.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.22% | -2.06% | -27.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -9.15% | -1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.86% | 4.50% | +10.36% |
Volatility
AZO vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) is 11.28%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that AZO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.28% | 14.07% | -2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.87% | 28.29% | -5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.10% | 34.50% | -7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.44% | 33.78% | -9.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.46% | 33.78% | -7.32% |
Dividends
AZO vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
AZO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.33% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AZO and CHPS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to AZO (11.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZO dropped -46.32% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.17 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZO and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer