PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZM.MI vs. BNP.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AZM.MI vs. BNP.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) and BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZM.MI achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than BNP.PA's 19.76% return. Over the past 10 years, AZM.MI has outperformed BNP.PA with an annualized return of 14.62%, while BNP.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 13.30% annualized return.


AZM.MI

1D
2.11%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
3.20%
6M
5.86%
1Y
41.64%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
14.62%

BNP.PA

1D
0.83%
1M
3.58%
YTD
19.76%
6M
28.34%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
26.67%
5Y*
18.63%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZM.MI vs. BNP.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZM.MI
Azimut Holding S.p.A
3.20%59.18%5.49%20.61%-9.38%45.88%-10.48%144.23%-32.60%6.22%
BNP.PA
BNP Paribas SA
19.76%50.14%0.99%25.73%-5.95%47.88%-18.41%43.63%-33.05%7.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AZM.MI and BNP.PA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2004

0.55

The correlation between AZM.MI and BNP.PA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZM.MI vs. BNP.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZM.MI
AZM.MI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AZM.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZM.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZM.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AZM.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZM.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BNP.PA
BNP.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BNP.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNP.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNP.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BNP.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNP.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZM.MI vs. BNP.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) and BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AZM.MIBNP.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.20

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

1.55

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

3.93

+5.01

AZM.MI vs. BNP.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZM.MI Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the BNP.PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZM.MI and BNP.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AZM.MIBNP.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.07

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.64

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.42

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.25

+0.20

Drawdowns

AZM.MI vs. BNP.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZM.MI drawdown since its inception was -77.83%, roughly equal to the maximum BNP.PA drawdown of -75.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZM.MI and BNP.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZM.MIBNP.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.83%

-75.43%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-19.50%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.14%

-21.82%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.64%

-34.11%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.91%

-59.43%

+3.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-0.49%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.59%

-19.98%

-3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

7.67%

-2.84%

Volatility

AZM.MI vs. BNP.PA - Volatility Comparison

Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA) at 7.11%. This indicates that AZM.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNP.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZM.MIBNP.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

7.11%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.13%

20.83%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.82%

28.23%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.06%

28.42%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.14%

31.19%

-0.05%

Dividends

AZM.MI vs. BNP.PA - Dividend Comparison

AZM.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than BNP.PA's 5.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZM.MI
Azimut Holding S.p.A
5.75%4.90%4.23%5.50%6.21%4.05%5.63%5.64%11.07%6.26%9.46%3.38%
BNP.PA
BNP Paribas SA
5.49%9.13%7.77%6.23%6.89%4.38%0.00%5.72%7.65%4.34%3.82%2.87%

Financials

AZM.MI vs. BNP.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Azimut Holding S.p.A and BNP Paribas SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AZM.MI and BNP.PA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZM.MI and BNP.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer