AZM.MI vs. BKNG

In the year-to-date period, AZM.MI achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than BKNG's 0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, AZM.MI has underperformed BKNG with an annualized return of 8.10%, while BKNG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AZM.MI Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the BKNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZM.MI and BKNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AZM.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than BKNG's 0.70% yield.

The maximum AZM.MI drawdown since its inception was -77.83%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZM.MI and BKNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) at 5.64%. This indicates that AZM.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Azimut Holding S.p.A and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.