AZM.MI vs. BKNG
Compare and contrast key facts about Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG).
Performance
AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZM.MI Azimut Holding S.p.A | -6.41% | 59.18% | 5.49% | 20.61% | -9.38% | 45.88% | -10.48% | 144.23% | -32.60% | 6.22% |
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | -20.08% | -4.30% | 50.63% | 70.74% | -10.80% | 15.78% | -0.49% | 21.93% | 3.77% | 3.96% |
Different Trading Currencies
AZM.MI is traded in EUR, while BKNG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BKNG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZM.MI achieves a -6.41% return, which is significantly higher than BKNG's -20.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AZM.MI having a 12.50% annualized return and BKNG not far ahead at 12.65%.
AZM.MI
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- -6.41%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 38.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.32%
- 5Y*
- 18.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
BKNG
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- -20.08%
- 6M
- -21.13%
- 1Y
- -15.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZM.MI vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank
AZM.MI
BKNG
AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZM.MI | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | -0.46 | +1.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | -0.46 | +2.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.94 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | -0.46 | +2.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | -1.21 | +8.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZM.MI | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | -0.46 | +1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.41 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.70 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between AZM.MI and BKNG is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison
AZM.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than BKNG's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZM.MI Azimut Holding S.p.A | 5.23% | 4.90% | 4.23% | 5.50% | 6.21% | 4.05% | 5.63% | 5.64% | 11.07% | 6.26% | 9.46% | 3.38% |
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 0.94% | 0.72% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZM.MI drawdown since its inception was -77.83%, which is greater than BKNG's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZM.MI and BKNG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZM.MI | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.83% | -99.32% | +21.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.67% | -33.20% | +15.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.64% | -39.53% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.91% | -47.77% | -8.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -27.45% | +17.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.70% | -47.20% | +23.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 12.97% | -7.58% |
Volatility
AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) is 9.47%, while Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that AZM.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AZM.MI | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.47% | 11.81% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.59% | 26.13% | -5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.60% | 33.88% | -3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 31.42% | -4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.31% | 32.14% | -0.83% |
Financials
AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Azimut Holding S.p.A and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities