PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZM.MI vs. BKNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AZM.MI is traded in EUR, while BKNG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BKNG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZM.MI achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than BKNG's -20.68% return. Over the past 10 years, AZM.MI has outperformed BKNG with an annualized return of 14.62%, while BKNG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.87% annualized return.


AZM.MI

1D
2.11%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
3.20%
6M
5.86%
1Y
41.64%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
14.62%

BKNG

1D
0.06%
1M
0.72%
YTD
-20.68%
6M
-19.00%
1Y
-25.31%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
11.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZM.MI
Azimut Holding S.p.A
3.20%59.18%5.49%20.61%-9.38%45.88%-10.48%144.23%-32.60%6.22%
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
-20.68%-4.30%50.63%70.74%-10.80%15.78%-0.49%21.93%3.77%3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AZM.MI and BKNG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZM.MI vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZM.MI
AZM.MI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AZM.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZM.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZM.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AZM.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZM.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BKNG
BKNG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AZM.MIBKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.88

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

-0.76

+3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

-1.50

+10.44

AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZM.MI Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the BKNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZM.MI and BKNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AZM.MIBKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

-0.79

+2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.44

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.37

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.67

-0.23

Drawdowns

AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZM.MI drawdown since its inception was -77.83%, which is greater than BKNG's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZM.MI and BKNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZM.MIBKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.83%

-59.02%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-33.63%

+18.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.14%

-34.39%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.64%

-34.39%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.91%

-43.00%

-12.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-27.76%

+25.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.59%

-10.23%

-13.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

16.88%

-12.05%

Volatility

AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Azimut Holding S.p.A (AZM.MI) is 8.42%, while Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that AZM.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZM.MIBKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

9.39%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.13%

27.15%

-9.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.82%

32.33%

-5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.06%

31.78%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.14%

32.31%

-1.17%

Dividends

AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison

AZM.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than BKNG's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZM.MI
Azimut Holding S.p.A
5.75%4.90%4.23%5.50%6.21%4.05%5.63%5.64%11.07%6.26%9.46%3.38%
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
1.20%0.72%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AZM.MI vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Azimut Holding S.p.A and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. AZM.MI values in EUR, BKNG values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


AZM.MI and BKNG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZM.MI and BKNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer