PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AYEM.DE vs. JREM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AYEM.DE vs. JREM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AYEM.DE) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AYEM.DE achieves a 26.90% return, which is significantly lower than JREM.DE's 30.82% return.


AYEM.DE

1D
-1.29%
1M
4.35%
YTD
26.90%
6M
27.17%
1Y
46.15%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*

JREM.DE

1D
-1.57%
1M
6.61%
YTD
30.82%
6M
32.74%
1Y
54.32%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AYEM.DE vs. JREM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AYEM.DE
iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
26.90%17.51%14.02%6.81%-14.64%6.10%7.92%21.67%-2.75%
JREM.DE
JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)
30.82%19.77%12.75%4.21%-15.62%4.87%8.43%24.14%-2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AYEM.DE and JREM.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2018

0.97

The correlation between AYEM.DE and JREM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AYEM.DE vs. JREM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AYEM.DE
AYEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AYEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AYEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

JREM.DE
JREM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
JREM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AYEM.DE vs. JREM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AYEM.DE) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AYEM.DEJREM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.54

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

5.31

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.83

19.31

-3.48

AYEM.DE vs. JREM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AYEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the JREM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AYEM.DE and JREM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AYEM.DEJREM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.99

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.48

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.56

+0.02

Drawdowns

AYEM.DE vs. JREM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AYEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, roughly equal to the maximum JREM.DE drawdown of -30.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AYEM.DE and JREM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AYEM.DEJREM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-30.28%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-10.19%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-19.29%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.38%

-25.75%

+2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-2.47%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-10.68%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.81%

+0.19%

Volatility

AYEM.DE vs. JREM.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AYEM.DE) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) have volatilities of 7.02% and 7.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AYEM.DEJREM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

7.19%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.89%

15.32%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

18.09%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.40%

16.94%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

18.97%

-0.35%

AYEM.DE vs. JREM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AYEM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JREM.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

AYEM.DE vs. JREM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AYEM.DE nor JREM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, AYEM.DE and JREM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AYEM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AYEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JREM.DE.

AYEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets IMI ESG Screened, while JREM.DE tracks JP Morgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG). They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AYEM.DE and 0.30% for JREM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AYEM.DE and JREM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer