AYBLX vs. PRWCX
AYBLX (Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund) and PRWCX (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, AYBLX returned 10.62%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for PRWCX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AYBLX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for PRWCX.
Performance
AYBLX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AYBLX achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's 4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, AYBLX has underperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 10.62%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.
AYBLX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 30.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
PRWCX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 11.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
AYBLX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 13.44% | 19.80% | 9.64% | 15.41% | -14.39% | 15.48% | 12.92% | 22.22% | -4.43% | 15.19% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 4.42% | 12.45% | 12.50% | 18.85% | -12.00% | 18.45% | 18.13% | 24.62% | 0.63% | 15.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between AYBLX and PRWCX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 1997 | 0.88 |
The correlation between AYBLX and PRWCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AYBLX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank
AYBLX
PRWCX
AYBLX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AYBLX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.28 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.76 | 1.84 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.03 | 7.70 | +14.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AYBLX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AYBLX drawdown since its inception was -36.28%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AYBLX and PRWCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AYBLX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.28% | -41.77% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.41% | -6.32% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.39% | -15.96% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.26% | -17.07% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.24% | -26.86% | +2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -1.69% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -3.33% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 1.50% | -0.12% |
Volatility
AYBLX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 2.81%. This indicates that AYBLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AYBLX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 2.81% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 6.44% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.98% | 7.79% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.14% | 12.79% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.32% | 12.73% | -1.41% |
AYBLX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AYBLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AYBLX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison
AYBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than PRWCX's 8.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 3.26% | 3.58% | 2.59% | 1.76% | 3.23% | 8.61% | 4.12% | 6.03% | 9.97% | 9.42% | 2.63% | 4.14% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 8.44% | 8.81% | 10.38% | 4.15% | 9.44% | 9.23% | 7.97% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.82% | 3.51% | 9.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AYBLX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AYBLX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to PRWCX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AYBLX dropped -36.28% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.
AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AYBLX and PRWCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer