PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AXTA vs. BSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AXTA vs. BSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) and Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AXTA achieves a -3.50% return, which is significantly higher than BSX's -49.98% return. Over the past 10 years, AXTA has underperformed BSX with an annualized return of 1.16%, while BSX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.66% annualized return.


AXTA

1D
2.63%
1M
16.82%
YTD
-3.50%
6M
3.93%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
-0.27%
5Y*
-0.89%
10Y*
1.16%

BSX

1D
0.02%
1M
-16.11%
YTD
-49.98%
6M
-51.62%
1Y
-53.74%
3Y*
-2.73%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
7.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXTA vs. BSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AXTA
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.
-3.50%-5.58%0.74%33.37%-23.10%16.01%-6.09%29.80%-27.63%18.97%
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation
-49.98%6.75%54.51%24.94%8.92%18.16%-20.50%27.96%42.56%14.61%

Correlation

The correlation between AXTA and BSX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.33

The correlation between AXTA and BSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AXTA:

$6.69B

BSX:

$71.30B

EPS

AXTA:

$1.71

BSX:

$2.38

PE Ratio

AXTA:

18.25

BSX:

20.07

PEG Ratio

AXTA:

1.20

BSX:

0.45

PS Ratio

AXTA:

1.32

BSX:

3.46

PB Ratio

AXTA:

2.76

BSX:

2.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

AXTA:

$5.11B

BSX:

$20.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AXTA:

$1.23B

BSX:

$14.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

AXTA:

$922.00M

BSX:

$4.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AXTA vs. BSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AXTA
AXTA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AXTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXTA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AXTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXTA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BSX
BSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AXTA vs. BSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) and Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AXTABSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.65

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

-0.96

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

-2.19

+2.33

AXTA vs. BSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AXTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the BSX Sharpe Ratio of -1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AXTA and BSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AXTABSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

-1.56

+1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.10

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.28

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.19

-0.08

Drawdowns

AXTA vs. BSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXTA drawdown since its inception was -63.60%, smaller than the maximum BSX drawdown of -89.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXTA and BSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AXTABSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.60%

-89.15%

+25.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.48%

-55.91%

+27.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.39%

-55.91%

+17.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-55.91%

+17.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.60%

-55.91%

-7.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.49%

-55.90%

+31.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.72%

-38.75%

+17.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.12%

24.56%

-12.44%

Volatility

AXTA vs. BSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) is 10.24%, while Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) has a volatility of 16.20%. This indicates that AXTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AXTABSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.24%

16.20%

-5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.27%

32.82%

-8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.04%

34.63%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.42%

25.66%

+4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.20%

27.29%

+4.91%

Dividends

AXTA vs. BSX - Dividend Comparison

Neither AXTA nor BSX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AXTA vs. BSX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. and Boston Scientific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
1.25B
5.20B
(AXTA) Total Revenue
(BSX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AXTA vs. BSX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. and Boston Scientific Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
69.4%
Portfolio components
AXTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BSX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Scientific Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.61B and revenue of 5.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

AXTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. reported an operating income of 146.00M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

BSX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Scientific Corporation reported an operating income of 1.07B and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

AXTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. reported a net income of 90.00M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

BSX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Scientific Corporation reported a net income of 1.34B and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in a net margin of 25.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AXTA and BSX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSX has higher volatility (16.20%) compared to AXTA (10.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AXTA dropped -63.60% vs BSX's -89.15%.

AXTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AXTA and BSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer