PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AXTA vs. ALB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AXTA vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AXTA achieves a -5.97% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's 19.31% return. Over the past 10 years, AXTA has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of 0.90%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.


AXTA

1D
-0.03%
1M
9.56%
YTD
-5.97%
6M
1.10%
1Y
-0.56%
3Y*
-1.13%
5Y*
-1.50%
10Y*
0.90%

ALB

1D
-2.00%
1M
-11.72%
YTD
19.31%
6M
33.82%
1Y
200.47%
3Y*
-5.45%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXTA vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AXTA
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.
-5.97%-5.58%0.74%33.37%-23.10%16.01%-6.09%29.80%-27.63%18.97%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
19.31%67.72%-39.50%-32.80%-6.63%59.76%105.39%-3.28%-38.89%50.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AXTA and ALB is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.41

The correlation between AXTA and ALB shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AXTA:

$6.52B

ALB:

$19.97B

EPS

AXTA:

$1.71

ALB:

-$2.33

PS Ratio

AXTA:

1.28

ALB:

3.61

PB Ratio

AXTA:

2.69

ALB:

2.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

AXTA:

$5.11B

ALB:

$5.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AXTA:

$1.23B

ALB:

$1.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

AXTA:

$922.00M

ALB:

$801.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AXTA vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AXTA
AXTA Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AXTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXTA Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AXTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXTA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ALB
ALB Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ALB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ALB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALB Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AXTA vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AXTAALBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

3.28

-3.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.21

3.26

-3.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.42

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

9.20

-9.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.11

21.20

-21.32

AXTA vs. ALB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AXTA Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AXTA and ALB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AXTAALBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

3.28

-3.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.01

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.19

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.30

-0.20

Drawdowns

AXTA vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXTA drawdown since its inception was -63.60%, smaller than the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXTA and ALB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AXTAALBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.60%

-83.90%

+20.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.48%

-21.93%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.39%

-78.60%

+40.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-83.90%

+45.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.60%

-83.90%

+20.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.42%

-45.68%

+19.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.72%

-20.66%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.09%

9.50%

+2.59%

Volatility

AXTA vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) is 11.00%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 11.91%. This indicates that AXTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AXTAALBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.00%

11.91%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.14%

41.34%

-17.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.95%

61.57%

-30.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.40%

54.38%

-23.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.20%

48.17%

-15.97%

Dividends

AXTA vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

AXTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
0.96%1.15%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.01%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%
AXTA
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AXTA vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.25B
1.43B
(AXTA) Total Revenue
(ALB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AXTA vs. ALB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. and Albemarle Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
35.1%
Portfolio components
AXTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ALB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 500.97M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.

AXTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. reported an operating income of 146.00M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

ALB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of 233.51M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

AXTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. reported a net income of 90.00M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

ALB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of 277.40M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AXTA and ALB have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALB has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to AXTA (11.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AXTA dropped -63.60% vs ALB's -83.90%.

ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AXTA and ALB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer