AXTA vs. ALB
AXTA (Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.) and ALB (Albemarle Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Chemicals industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, AXTA returned 2.48%/yr vs 4.77%/yr for ALB. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AXTA vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AXTA achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's -16.41% return. Over the past 10 years, AXTA has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of 2.48%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 4.77% annualized return.
AXTA
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 28.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.69%
ALB
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -13.22%
- 6M
- -30.71%
- YTD
- -16.41%
- 1Y
- 75.60%
- 3Y*
- -16.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $278.16M | $258.77M | $355.35M | |
| $60.20M | $53.80M | $74.03M |
AXTA vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AXTA Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. | 10.83% | -5.58% | 0.74% | 33.37% | -23.10% | 16.01% | -6.09% | 29.80% | -27.63% | 18.97% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | -16.41% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -38.89% | 50.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AXTA and ALB is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2014 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AXTA and ALB has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
AXTA:
$7.66B
ALB:
$13.87B
AXTA:
$1.62
ALB:
-$2.33
AXTA:
1.49
ALB:
2.53
AXTA:
3.05
ALB:
1.83
AXTA:
$5.15B
ALB:
$5.49B
AXTA:
$1.68B
ALB:
$1.02B
AXTA:
$910.00M
ALB:
$801.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AXTA vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank
AXTA
ALB
AXTA vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AXTA | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.61 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 4.40 | -2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AXTA vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AXTA drawdown since its inception was -63.60%, smaller than the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXTA and ALB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AXTA | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.60% | -83.90% | +20.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.48% | -47.38% | +18.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.39% | -74.05% | +35.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.39% | -83.90% | +45.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.60% | -83.90% | +20.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.27% | -61.95% | +48.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.68% | -20.83% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.18% | 17.27% | -5.09% |
Volatility
AXTA vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) has a higher volatility of 11.11% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 8.79%. This indicates that AXTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AXTA | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.11% | 8.79% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.23% | 40.94% | -14.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.30% | 59.34% | -27.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 54.68% | -23.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.32% | 48.44% | -16.12% |
Dividends
AXTA vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
AXTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
AXTA Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AXTA vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AXTA vs. ALB - Profitability Comparison
AXTA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. reported a gross profit of 465.00M and revenue of 1.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.6%.
ALB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 500.97M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
AXTA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. reported an operating income of 167.00M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
ALB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of 233.51M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
AXTA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. reported a net income of 89.00M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
ALB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of 277.40M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AXTA and ALB have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AXTA has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to ALB (8.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AXTA dropped -63.60% vs ALB's -83.90%.
ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AXTA and ALB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer