PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AXR vs. TGLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AXR vs. TGLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMREP Corporation (AXR) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AXR achieves a 40.53% return, which is significantly higher than TGLS's -9.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AXR having a 18.60% annualized return and TGLS not far behind at 18.38%.


AXR

1D
1.58%
1M
1.58%
YTD
40.53%
6M
39.05%
1Y
21.64%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*
18.60%

TGLS

1D
-1.71%
1M
10.25%
YTD
-9.50%
6M
-10.89%
1Y
-38.33%
3Y*
-1.16%
5Y*
18.53%
10Y*
18.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXR vs. TGLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AXR
AMREP Corporation
40.53%-40.13%42.92%90.22%-24.01%77.99%42.81%0.50%-15.24%-5.39%
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
-9.50%-35.98%74.88%49.86%18.91%281.83%-14.53%10.03%15.12%-36.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AXR and TGLS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2012

0.07

The correlation between AXR and TGLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AXR:

$142.38M

TGLS:

$2.03B

EPS

AXR:

$2.40

TGLS:

$3.24

PE Ratio

AXR:

11.00

TGLS:

14.02

PEG Ratio

AXR:

0.18

TGLS:

0.41

PS Ratio

AXR:

2.68

TGLS:

2.07

PB Ratio

AXR:

1.02

TGLS:

2.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

AXR:

$53.00M

TGLS:

$1.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AXR:

$38.94M

TGLS:

$419.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

AXR:

$14.48M

TGLS:

$251.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AXR vs. TGLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AXR
AXR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

TGLS
TGLS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TGLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AXR vs. TGLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMREP Corporation (AXR) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AXRTGLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.84

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

-0.71

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.34

-1.07

+2.42

AXR vs. TGLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AXR Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the TGLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AXR and TGLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AXR vs. TGLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, which is greater than TGLS's maximum drawdown of -81.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXR and TGLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AXRTGLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.43%

-81.32%

-16.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.12%

-53.83%

+20.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.34%

-56.55%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.34%

-56.55%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.88%

-77.98%

+19.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.45%

-48.13%

-33.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.96%

-23.06%

-42.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.14%

35.82%

-19.68%

Volatility

AXR vs. TGLS - Volatility Comparison

AMREP Corporation (AXR) has a higher volatility of 12.56% compared to Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) at 9.10%. This indicates that AXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AXRTGLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.56%

9.10%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.28%

30.05%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.93%

39.14%

+7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.61%

53.35%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.59%

54.26%

-5.67%

Dividends

AXR vs. TGLS - Dividend Comparison

AXR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TGLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AXR
AMREP Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
1.32%1.19%0.61%0.79%0.91%0.56%1.59%6.79%5.20%7.21%2.04%

Financials

AXR vs. TGLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMREP Corporation and Tecnoglass Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
14.57M
249.01M
(AXR) Total Revenue
(TGLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AXR vs. TGLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AMREP Corporation and Tecnoglass Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
71.5%
38.5%
Portfolio components
AXR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMREP Corporation reported a gross profit of 10.42M and revenue of 14.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

TGLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported a gross profit of 95.83M and revenue of 249.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.

AXR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMREP Corporation reported an operating income of 3.01M and revenue of 14.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

TGLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported an operating income of 44.94M and revenue of 249.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

AXR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMREP Corporation reported a net income of 3.15M and revenue of 14.57M, resulting in a net margin of 21.6%.

TGLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported a net income of 31.89M and revenue of 249.01M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AXR and TGLS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AXR has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to TGLS (9.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AXR dropped -97.43% vs TGLS's -81.32%.

AXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AXR and TGLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer