AXQT.DE vs. XGLF.DE
AXQT.DE (AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XGLF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - AXQT.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned while XGLF.DE tracks the MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AXQT.DE returned 57.81% vs 4.64% for XGLF.DE. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AXQT.DE charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XGLF.DE.
Performance
AXQT.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AXQT.DE achieves a 36.68% return, which is significantly higher than XGLF.DE's 6.19% return.
AXQT.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- YTD
- 36.68%
- 1Y
- 57.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XGLF.DE
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
AXQT.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AXQT.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc | 36.68% | 24.51% |
XGLF.DE Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 6.19% | -5.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between AXQT.DE and XGLF.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AXQT.DE vs. XGLF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AXQT.DE
XGLF.DE
AXQT.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AXQT.DE | XGLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.07 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.05 | 0.51 | +4.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.72 | 1.11 | +14.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AXQT.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AXQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum XGLF.DE drawdown of -42.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXQT.DE and XGLF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AXQT.DE | XGLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | -42.15% | +29.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -9.05% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | -17.67% | +8.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -18.25% | +15.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 4.16% | -0.47% |
Volatility
AXQT.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Volatility Comparison
AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) at 3.71%. This indicates that AXQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AXQT.DE | XGLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.67% | 3.71% | +5.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.47% | 8.99% | +10.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 12.56% | +9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 15.36% | +6.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 18.33% | +3.71% |
AXQT.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AXQT.DE has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than XGLF.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AXQT.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AXQT.DE nor XGLF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AXQT.DE and XGLF.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AXQT.DE is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AXQT.DE is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XGLF.DE.
AXQT.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned, while XGLF.DE tracks MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: AXA IM and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AXQT.DE and 0.65% for XGLF.DE.
Find the right allocation for AXQT.DE and XGLF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer