PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AXPG vs. LABU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AXPG vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF (AXPG) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AXPG

1D
1.29%
1M
10.61%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LABU

1D
-8.20%
1M
38.01%
6M
52.81%
YTD
59.86%
1Y
286.59%
3Y*
26.50%
5Y*
-26.07%
10Y*
-9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXPG vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AXPG and LABU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AXPG vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AXPG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AXPG vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF (AXPG) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AXPGLABUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.08

AXPG vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AXPG vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXPG drawdown since its inception was -30.54%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXPG and LABU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AXPGLABUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.54%

-99.18%

+68.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-94.37%

+94.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.86%

-81.78%

+63.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.05%

Volatility

AXPG vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AXPGLABUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.65%

79.41%

-20.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.65%

96.05%

-37.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.65%

95.22%

-36.57%

AXPG vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AXPG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

AXPG vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

AXPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AXPG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.40%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


AXPG and LABU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AXPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AXPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for LABU.

LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for AXPG.

AXPG tracks American Express Company (AXP), while LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AXPG and 0.96% for LABU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AXPG and LABU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer