AWWIX vs. FAOAX
AWWIX (CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund) and FAOAX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, AWWIX returned 6.42%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for FAOAX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. AWWIX charges 0.94%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for FAOAX.
Performance
AWWIX vs. FAOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AWWIX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 1Y
- 15.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.74%
FAOAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -0.36%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
AWWIX vs. FAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWWIX CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund | 5.45% | 26.10% | 5.39% | 15.31% | -14.12% | 2.01% | 17.03% | 9.68% |
FAOAX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A | 0.00% | 14.93% | 4.63% | 20.01% | -24.61% | 18.90% | 14.71% | 10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWWIX and FAOAX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AWWIX and FAOAX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWWIX vs. FAOAX — Risk / Return Rank
AWWIX
FAOAX
AWWIX vs. FAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWWIX | FAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.93 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | -0.34 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | -0.52 | +4.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWWIX vs. FAOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWWIX drawdown since its inception was -32.98%, smaller than the maximum FAOAX drawdown of -60.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWWIX and FAOAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWWIX | FAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.98% | -60.03% | +27.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | -7.29% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.78% | -13.99% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.35% | -36.50% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -5.87% | +4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -14.52% | +7.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 4.49% | -0.80% |
Volatility
AWWIX vs. FAOAX - Volatility Comparison
CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that AWWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWWIX | FAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 0.00% | +4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.58% | 0.00% | +13.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.19% | 7.67% | +8.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 16.65% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 16.28% | +2.52% |
AWWIX vs. FAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWWIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOAX's 1.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWWIX vs. FAOAX - Dividend Comparison
AWWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FAOAX's 8.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWWIX CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund | 0.69% | 0.73% | 1.14% | 1.16% | 1.53% | 1.97% | 0.26% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FAOAX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A | 8.54% | 8.54% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 0.38% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 4.64% | 3.64% | 1.75% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWWIX and FAOAX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AWWIX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to FAOAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWWIX dropped -32.98% vs FAOAX's -60.03%.
AWWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWWIX and FAOAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer