PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWWIX vs. FAERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWWIX vs. FAERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M (FAERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AWWIX

1D
0.66%
1M
4.02%
YTD
4.02%
6M
4.91%
1Y
11.91%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*

FAERX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-1.93%
3Y*
8.31%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
6.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWWIX vs. FAERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AWWIX
CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund
4.02%26.10%5.39%15.31%-14.12%2.01%17.03%9.68%
FAERX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M
0.00%14.70%4.40%19.78%-24.77%18.63%14.43%10.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AWWIX and FAERX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between AWWIX and FAERX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWWIX vs. FAERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWWIX
AWWIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
AWWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AWWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FAERX
FAERX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FAERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAERX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FAERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAERX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWWIX vs. FAERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M (FAERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AWWIXFAERXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

-0.31

+1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

-0.36

+1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.95

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

-0.39

+1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.23

-0.66

+3.89

AWWIX vs. FAERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWWIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the FAERX Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWWIX and FAERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AWWIXFAERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

-0.31

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.20

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.31

+0.15

Drawdowns

AWWIX vs. FAERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWWIX drawdown since its inception was -32.98%, smaller than the maximum FAERX drawdown of -60.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWWIX and FAERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWWIXFAERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.98%

-60.14%

+27.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-7.29%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.78%

-14.00%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-36.62%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-5.89%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.74%

-14.37%

+7.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

3.99%

-0.39%

Volatility

AWWIX vs. FAERX - Volatility Comparison

CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M (FAERX) at 0.00%. This indicates that AWWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWWIXFAERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

0.00%

+4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

4.07%

+8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

9.19%

+6.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

16.73%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

16.69%

+2.13%

AWWIX vs. FAERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWWIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than FAERX's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWWIX vs. FAERX - Dividend Comparison

AWWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than FAERX's 7.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWWIX
CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund
0.70%0.73%1.14%1.16%1.53%1.97%0.26%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAERX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M
7.94%7.94%0.96%0.51%0.12%2.07%0.00%1.15%4.25%3.35%0.80%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


AWWIX and FAERX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWWIX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to FAERX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWWIX dropped -32.98% vs FAERX's -60.14%.

AWWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWWIX and FAERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer