AWTAX vs. CSUIX
AWTAX (Virtus Water Fund) and CSUIX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.) are both mutual funds - AWTAX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Allianz, while CSUIX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Cohen & Steers. Over the past 10 years, AWTAX returned 7.42%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for CSUIX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AWTAX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CSUIX.
Performance
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWTAX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 12.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AWTAX having a 7.42% annualized return and CSUIX not far ahead at 7.58%.
AWTAX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 1.45%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.11%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AWTAX Virtus Water Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWTAX Virtus Water Fund | 0.47% | 11.87% | 5.25% | 11.99% | -21.01% | 25.39% | 16.68% | 32.78% | -12.50% | 21.99% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 12.65% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWTAX and CSUIX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AWTAX and CSUIX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWTAX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
AWTAX
CSUIX
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWTAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.33 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 3.15 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | 10.01 | -9.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWTAX drawdown since its inception was -54.12%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWTAX and CSUIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWTAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.12% | -52.01% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -5.96% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.00% | -11.74% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -20.01% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.78% | -35.01% | +2.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | -1.68% | -5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -8.11% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 1.87% | +3.73% |
Volatility
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.03%. This indicates that AWTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWTAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 3.03% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 8.16% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 10.13% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 12.98% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 14.87% | +2.37% |
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWTAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
AWTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.87%, more than CSUIX's 7.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWTAX Virtus Water Fund | 11.87% | 11.93% | 7.78% | 3.30% | 0.42% | 7.72% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 3.71% | 2.43% | 0.99% | 0.38% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.91% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWTAX and CSUIX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AWTAX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to CSUIX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWTAX dropped -54.12% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.
CSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWTAX and CSUIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer