AWTAX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
AWTAX is managed by Allianz. It was launched on Mar 30, 2008. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWTAX Virtus Water Fund | -2.95% | 11.87% | 5.25% | 11.99% | -21.01% | 25.39% | 16.68% | 32.78% | -12.50% | 21.99% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWTAX achieves a -2.95% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 8.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AWTAX having a 7.71% annualized return and CSUIX not far ahead at 7.83%.
AWTAX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -10.19%
- YTD
- -2.95%
- 6M
- -4.73%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 6.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWTAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AWTAX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
AWTAX
CSUIX
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWTAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 1.67 | -1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 2.21 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.33 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 2.42 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 10.58 | -8.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWTAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 1.67 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.64 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between AWTAX and CSUIX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
AWTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%, more than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWTAX Virtus Water Fund | 12.29% | 11.93% | 7.78% | 3.30% | 0.42% | 7.72% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 3.71% | 2.43% | 0.99% | 0.38% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWTAX drawdown since its inception was -54.12%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWTAX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWTAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.12% | -52.01% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -7.99% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -20.01% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.78% | -35.01% | +2.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.27% | -4.36% | -5.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -8.21% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 1.82% | +1.41% |
Volatility
AWTAX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that AWTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AWTAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 3.24% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 6.90% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.71% | 11.49% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 12.86% | +4.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 14.88% | +2.38% |