PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWGIX vs. MRFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWGIX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund (AWGIX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWGIX achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly higher than MRFOX's -0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, AWGIX has underperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 11.87%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.41% annualized return.


AWGIX

1D
-0.36%
1M
4.77%
YTD
8.58%
6M
7.69%
1Y
10.80%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
11.87%

MRFOX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
-1.78%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWGIX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWGIX
CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund
8.58%6.07%13.44%35.47%-29.76%25.42%29.80%36.12%2.01%19.10%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
-0.99%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AWGIX and MRFOX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between AWGIX and MRFOX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWGIX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWGIX
AWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWGIX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund (AWGIX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AWGIXMRFOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

0.48

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

0.76

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.09

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

0.66

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.03

1.90

+0.13

AWGIX vs. MRFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the MRFOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWGIX and MRFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AWGIXMRFOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.48

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.91

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

1.09

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

1.06

-0.72

Drawdowns

AWGIX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWGIX drawdown since its inception was -52.83%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWGIX and MRFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWGIXMRFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.83%

-29.10%

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.32%

-7.03%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-7.91%

-19.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.79%

-12.98%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.47%

-29.10%

-5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-3.39%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-2.37%

-10.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.44%

2.44%

+3.00%

Volatility

AWGIX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison

CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund (AWGIX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 2.49%. This indicates that AWGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWGIXMRFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

2.49%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

6.94%

+5.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

9.77%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.46%

12.06%

+8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

14.26%

+6.85%

AWGIX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWGIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWGIX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison

AWGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than MRFOX's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AWGIX
CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund
5.20%5.64%2.60%1.17%6.87%11.20%7.87%10.11%20.24%0.00%0.00%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.64%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


AWGIX and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWGIX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to MRFOX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWGIX dropped -52.83% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.

AWGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWGIX and MRFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer