PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWEIX vs. NWAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWEIX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CIBC Atlas Disciplined Equity Fund (AWEIX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWEIX achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than NWAUX's 5.53% return.


AWEIX

1D
1.50%
1M
0.26%
6M
2.97%
YTD
3.11%
1Y
10.44%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
12.65%
ALL TIME*
10.14%

NWAUX

1D
0.28%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.75%
YTD
5.53%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AWEIX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AWEIX
CIBC Atlas Disciplined Equity Fund
3.11%11.55%19.26%20.74%-18.97%25.66%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
5.53%-4.92%27.90%18.30%-3.23%22.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AWEIX and NWAUX is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.64

The correlation between AWEIX and NWAUX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWEIX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AWEIX
AWEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AWEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AWEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

NWAUX
NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AWEIX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas Disciplined Equity Fund (AWEIX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AWEIXNWAUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.10

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

0.68

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

1.54

+0.89

AWEIX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWEIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWEIX and NWAUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AWEIX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWEIX drawdown since its inception was -51.13%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWEIX and NWAUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWEIXNWAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.13%

-21.07%

-30.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.93%

-8.55%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.64%

-19.31%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.38%

-21.07%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-10.57%

+9.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-7.04%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.77%

-0.52%

Volatility

AWEIX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

CIBC Atlas Disciplined Equity Fund (AWEIX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 2.69%. This indicates that AWEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWEIXNWAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.69%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

8.30%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

10.57%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

16.11%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

15.83%

+1.94%

AWEIX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWEIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWEIX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

AWEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.11%, more than NWAUX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWEIX
CIBC Atlas Disciplined Equity Fund
14.11%14.54%6.39%4.72%4.13%7.09%2.52%2.08%8.91%2.68%1.49%5.46%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
4.93%4.35%13.58%0.40%1.93%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AWEIX and NWAUX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWEIX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to NWAUX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWEIX dropped -51.13% vs NWAUX's -21.07%.

AWEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWEIX and NWAUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer