PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWEIX vs. DURPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWEIX vs. DURPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CIBC Atlas Disciplined Equity Fund (AWEIX) and DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWEIX achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than DURPX's 9.00% return.


AWEIX

1D
1.50%
1M
0.26%
6M
2.97%
YTD
3.11%
1Y
10.44%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
12.65%
ALL TIME*
10.14%

DURPX

1D
1.20%
1M
-0.74%
6M
7.28%
YTD
9.00%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AWEIX vs. DURPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWEIX
CIBC Atlas Disciplined Equity Fund
3.11%11.55%19.26%20.74%-18.97%25.71%19.27%30.63%0.84%12.21%
DURPX
DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio
9.00%12.81%20.49%21.85%-11.82%25.27%19.29%33.11%-5.11%17.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AWEIX and DURPX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2017

0.93

The correlation between AWEIX and DURPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWEIX vs. DURPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AWEIX
AWEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AWEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AWEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DURPX
DURPX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DURPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DURPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DURPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DURPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DURPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AWEIX vs. DURPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas Disciplined Equity Fund (AWEIX) and DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AWEIXDURPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.22

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

1.71

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

7.11

-4.68

AWEIX vs. DURPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWEIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the DURPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWEIX and DURPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AWEIX vs. DURPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWEIX drawdown since its inception was -51.13%, which is greater than DURPX's maximum drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWEIX and DURPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWEIXDURPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.13%

-31.02%

-20.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.93%

-8.67%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.64%

-18.38%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.38%

-21.90%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-1.30%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-4.01%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.08%

+1.17%

Volatility

AWEIX vs. DURPX - Volatility Comparison

CIBC Atlas Disciplined Equity Fund (AWEIX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) at 2.99%. This indicates that AWEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DURPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWEIXDURPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.99%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

9.58%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

11.95%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

15.98%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

17.52%

+0.25%

AWEIX vs. DURPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWEIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than DURPX's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWEIX vs. DURPX - Dividend Comparison

AWEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.11%, more than DURPX's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWEIX
CIBC Atlas Disciplined Equity Fund
14.11%14.54%6.39%4.72%4.13%7.09%2.52%2.08%8.91%2.68%1.49%5.46%
DURPX
DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio
0.96%1.05%1.20%1.49%3.65%4.12%1.34%1.36%1.69%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AWEIX and DURPX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWEIX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to DURPX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWEIX dropped -51.13% vs DURPX's -31.02%.

DURPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWEIX and DURPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer