AWAY vs. RSPD
AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) and RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index while RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AWAY returned -5.64%/yr vs 4.27%/yr for RSPD. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AWAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPD.
Performance
AWAY vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWAY achieves a -3.03% return, which is significantly lower than RSPD's 2.56% return.
AWAY
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- -6.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.29%
RSPD
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 5.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $667.86K | $330.70K | $217.64K | |
| $4.12M | $3.29M | $3.49M |
AWAY vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | -3.03% | -3.36% | 10.44% | 17.94% | -32.25% | -5.91% | 3.47% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 2.56% | 7.98% | 13.37% | 22.55% | -24.03% | 28.75% | 11.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWAY and RSPD is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between AWAY and RSPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
AWAY vs. RSPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AWAY
RSPD
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AWAY
RSPD
Technology
AWAY
RSPD
Communication Services
AWAY
RSPD
Industrials
AWAY
RSPD
Financial Services
AWAY
RSPD
Basic Materials
AWAY
-
RSPD
-
Consumer Defensive
AWAY
-
RSPD
-
Energy
AWAY
-
RSPD
-
Healthcare
AWAY
-
RSPD
-
Real Estate
AWAY
-
RSPD
-
Utilities
AWAY
-
RSPD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWAY vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank
AWAY
RSPD
AWAY vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWAY | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.07 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.42 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 0.93 | -1.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWAY vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWAY drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum RSPD drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAY and RSPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWAY | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -68.00% | +11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.83% | -13.80% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.83% | -21.01% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.10% | -34.41% | -14.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.50% | -2.55% | -38.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.50% | -10.66% | -25.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.45% | 6.15% | +12.30% |
Volatility
AWAY vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) at 5.99%. This indicates that AWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWAY | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 5.99% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.01% | 14.57% | +4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.17% | 18.73% | +4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 22.17% | +4.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 23.12% | +8.52% |
AWAY vs. RSPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWAY vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison
AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.85% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.27% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWAY and RSPD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AWAY has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to RSPD (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAY dropped -56.57% vs RSPD's -68.00%.
On 5-year performance, RSPD leads with 4.27% vs -5.64% for AWAY. On fees, RSPD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPD has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RSPD has performed better with a 4.27% return vs -5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.
RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.
AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index, while RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AWAY and 0.40% for RSPD.
RSPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWAY and RSPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer