PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AWAY vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AWAY vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AWAY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Prime Travel Technology Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AWAY returned -10.42%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for EINC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AWAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

AWAY vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWAY achieves a -14.15% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.27% return.

AWAY

1D
-1.25%
1M
8.11%
YTD
-14.15%
6M
-16.05%
1Y
-13.55%
3Y*
1.81%
5Y*
-10.42%
10Y*
—

EINC

1D
1.33%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
24.27%
6M
25.77%
1Y
27.21%
3Y*
29.77%
5Y*
20.86%
10Y*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWAY vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AWAY
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF		-14.15%-3.36%10.44%17.94%-32.25%-5.91%3.47%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		24.27%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-18.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AWAY and EINC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020

0.41

The correlation between AWAY and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AWAY vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
AWAY
EINC

Consumer Cyclical

64.2%

-

Technology

29.0%

-

Communication Services

4.4%

-

Industrials

1.2%
2.5%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

99.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AWAY
64.2%
EINC

-

Technology

AWAY
29.0%
EINC

-

Communication Services

AWAY
4.4%
EINC

-

Industrials

AWAY
1.2%
EINC
2.5%

Financial Services

AWAY
0.2%
EINC

-

Basic Materials

AWAY

-

EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

AWAY

-

EINC

-

Energy

AWAY

-

EINC
99.4%

Healthcare

AWAY

-

EINC

-

Real Estate

AWAY

-

EINC

-

Utilities

AWAY

-

EINC
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ETFMG Travel Tech ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with AWAY:
AWAY vs. JETSAWAY vs. HACKAWAY vs. PEJAWAY vs. EXPEAWAY vs. FLYUAWAY vs. VGTAWAY vs. SOXL
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

AWAY vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AWAY
AWAY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
AWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
AWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWAY vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

AWAYEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.61
1.82

-2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.73
2.47

-3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.32

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

3.47

-3.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

8.82

-9.61

AWAY vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWAY and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AWAY vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWAY drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAY and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AWAYEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-87.55%

+30.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.83%

-7.89%

-24.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.83%

-16.01%

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.63%

-19.87%

-31.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.21%

-5.79%

-42.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.31%

-44.16%

+7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.14%

3.09%

+14.05%

Volatility

AWAY vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.32%. This indicates that AWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AWAYEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

6.32%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.50%

11.86%

+6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.44%

15.07%

+7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.89%

19.54%

+7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.75%

25.43%

+6.32%

AWAY vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

AWAY vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWAY
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF		0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.56%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

AWAY and EINC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWAY has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to EINC (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAY dropped -56.57% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 20.86% vs -10.42% for AWAY. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 20.86% return vs -10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.

AWAY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AWAY and 0.45% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWAY and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer