PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AW1Z.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AW1Z.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1Z.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AW1Z.DE having a 9.37% return and H4ZA.DE slightly higher at 9.79%.


AW1Z.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.84%
6M
5.98%
YTD
9.37%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
11.80%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*

H4ZA.DE

1D
-0.80%
1M
-1.22%
6M
5.52%
YTD
9.79%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1Z.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AW1Z.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
9.37%16.28%6.31%17.64%-13.87%18.74%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
9.79%22.26%11.06%22.59%-8.87%17.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AW1Z.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.96

The correlation between AW1Z.DE and H4ZA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AW1Z.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1Z.DE
AW1Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AW1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1Z.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1Z.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AW1Z.DEH4ZA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.72

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.77

6.00

-1.23

AW1Z.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AW1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AW1Z.DE and H4ZA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AW1Z.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.70%, smaller than the maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown of -38.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1Z.DE and H4ZA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AW1Z.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.70%

-38.40%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-10.97%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

-16.39%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.70%

-23.26%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-2.69%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-7.18%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.14%

-0.14%

Volatility

AW1Z.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1Z.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) have volatilities of 3.86% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AW1Z.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.98%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

13.35%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

16.04%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

17.53%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

17.81%

-1.76%

AW1Z.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1Z.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AW1Z.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison

AW1Z.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AW1Z.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.38%2.49%2.89%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, AW1Z.DE and H4ZA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for AW1Z.DE.

AW1Z.DE tracks MSCI EMU Climate Paris Aligned, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: UBS and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for AW1Z.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AW1Z.DE and H4ZA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer