PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AW1I.DE vs. UIQ4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AW1I.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Japan ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (JPY) Acc (AW1I.DE) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AW1I.DE achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than UIQ4.DE's 4.07% return.


AW1I.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.07%
6M
12.93%
YTD
19.55%
1Y
39.39%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
10Y*

UIQ4.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
6M
3.81%
YTD
4.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1I.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AW1I.DE and UIQ4.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AW1I.DE vs. UIQ4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1I.DE
AW1I.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AW1I.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1I.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1I.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1I.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1I.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

UIQ4.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1I.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Japan ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (JPY) Acc (AW1I.DE) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AW1I.DEUIQ4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

AW1I.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AW1I.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1I.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.66%, which is greater than UIQ4.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1I.DE and UIQ4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AW1I.DEUIQ4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.66%

-3.90%

-15.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-0.24%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-0.76%

-5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

Volatility

AW1I.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AW1I.DEUIQ4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.00%

7.80%

+12.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

7.80%

+9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

7.80%

+9.09%

AW1I.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1I.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UIQ4.DE's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AW1I.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AW1I.DE nor UIQ4.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AW1I.DE and UIQ4.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AW1I.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AW1I.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for UIQ4.DE.

AW1I.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while UIQ4.DE is Derivative Income. AW1I.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while UIQ4.DE tracks Euro Equity Defensive Put Write Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AW1I.DE and 0.21% for UIQ4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AW1I.DE and UIQ4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer