PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AW1I.DE vs. 3JPN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AW1I.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Japan ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (JPY) Acc (AW1I.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AW1I.DE achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly lower than 3JPN.DE's 38.72% return.


AW1I.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.07%
6M
12.93%
YTD
19.55%
1Y
39.39%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
10Y*

3JPN.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
6M
19.81%
YTD
38.72%
1Y
92.00%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1I.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AW1I.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Japan ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (JPY) Acc
19.55%13.16%14.27%15.68%-2.68%
3JPN.DE
Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities
38.72%27.74%0.10%34.83%-6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between AW1I.DE and 3JPN.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022

0.91

The correlation between AW1I.DE and 3JPN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AW1I.DE vs. 3JPN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1I.DE
AW1I.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AW1I.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1I.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1I.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1I.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1I.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

3JPN.DE
3JPN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
3JPN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1I.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Japan ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (JPY) Acc (AW1I.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AW1I.DE3JPN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

2.66

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

7.48

+4.72

AW1I.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AW1I.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the 3JPN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AW1I.DE and 3JPN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AW1I.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1I.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.66%, smaller than the maximum 3JPN.DE drawdown of -51.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1I.DE and 3JPN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AW1I.DE3JPN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.66%

-51.65%

+31.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-34.71%

+24.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.12%

-51.65%

+34.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-9.73%

+7.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-14.63%

+8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

12.34%

-9.10%

Volatility

AW1I.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Japan ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (JPY) Acc (AW1I.DE) is 6.50%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) has a volatility of 19.78%. This indicates that AW1I.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3JPN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AW1I.DE3JPN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

19.78%

-13.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.04%

52.13%

-36.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.00%

63.40%

-43.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

53.27%

-36.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

53.27%

-36.38%

AW1I.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1I.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 3JPN.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AW1I.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AW1I.DE nor 3JPN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AW1I.DE and 3JPN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AW1I.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AW1I.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3JPN.DE.

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AW1I.DE and 0.75% for 3JPN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AW1I.DE and 3JPN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer