PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AW1H.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AW1H.DE achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZA.DE's 7.24% return.


AW1H.DE

1D
0.38%
1M
2.09%
YTD
7.82%
6M
9.94%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
10Y*

H4ZA.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
1.94%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.59%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AW1H.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
7.82%23.67%10.99%18.33%-14.28%2.74%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
7.24%22.26%13.81%22.59%-8.87%3.84%

Correlation

The correlation between AW1H.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021

0.98

The correlation between AW1H.DE and H4ZA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1H.DE
AW1H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AW1H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AW1H.DEH4ZA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.18

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.43

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.86

4.85

+1.01

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AW1H.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AW1H.DE and H4ZA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AW1H.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.98

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.41

+0.14

Drawdowns

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1H.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.23%, smaller than the maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1H.DE and H4ZA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AW1H.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.23%

-38.41%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-10.97%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-16.40%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.50%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-7.84%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.24%

-0.26%

Volatility

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) is 4.49%, while HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that AW1H.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AW1H.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

4.95%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

12.99%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

15.99%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

17.50%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

18.17%

-1.41%

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1H.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison

AW1H.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AW1H.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.44%2.49%5.35%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, AW1H.DE and H4ZA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for AW1H.DE.

AW1H.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: UBS and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for AW1H.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AW1H.DE and H4ZA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer