AW1H.DE vs. AW1C.DE
AW1H.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc) and AW1C.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AW1H.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while AW1C.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® ESG Elite. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AW1H.DE returned 15.67%/yr vs 21.18%/yr for AW1C.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AW1H.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AW1C.DE.
Performance
AW1H.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AW1H.DE achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than AW1C.DE's 21.11% return.
AW1H.DE
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AW1C.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 22.20%
- 1Y
- 39.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- —
AW1H.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AW1H.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc | 7.82% | 23.67% | 10.99% | 18.33% | -14.28% | 2.74% |
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.11% | 6.94% | 24.89% | 24.93% | -14.50% | 12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between AW1H.DE and AW1C.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between AW1H.DE and AW1C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AW1H.DE vs. AW1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AW1H.DE
AW1C.DE
AW1H.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AW1H.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.48 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.33 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 4.43 | +1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AW1H.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.56 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.92 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
AW1H.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AW1H.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.23%, which is greater than AW1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1H.DE and AW1C.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AW1H.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.23% | -22.40% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -16.86% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -22.40% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.12% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.74% | -5.82% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 8.90% | -5.92% |
Volatility
AW1H.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) at 3.81%. This indicates that AW1H.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AW1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AW1H.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 3.81% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 9.14% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 25.24% | -10.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 18.35% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 18.11% | -1.35% |
AW1H.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AW1H.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AW1C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AW1H.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AW1H.DE nor AW1C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AW1H.DE and AW1C.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AW1H.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1H.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AW1C.DE.
AW1H.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while AW1C.DE is S&P 500. AW1H.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for AW1H.DE and 0.15% for AW1C.DE.
Find the right allocation for AW1H.DE and AW1C.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer