PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AW1F.DE vs. D6RQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AW1F.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1F.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AW1F.DE having a 12.99% return and D6RQ.DE slightly lower at 12.89%.


AW1F.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.23%
YTD
12.99%
6M
13.25%
1Y
26.73%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
10Y*

D6RQ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
12.89%
6M
12.85%
1Y
30.87%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
16.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1F.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AW1F.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
12.99%3.65%32.30%24.10%-18.01%12.73%
D6RQ.DE
Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
12.89%4.36%42.08%34.15%-22.07%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AW1F.DE and D6RQ.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021

0.95

The correlation between AW1F.DE and D6RQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AW1F.DE vs. D6RQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1F.DE
AW1F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AW1F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

D6RQ.DE
D6RQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1F.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1F.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AW1F.DED6RQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.50

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.74

7.19

+3.54

AW1F.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AW1F.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AW1F.DE and D6RQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AW1F.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1F.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum D6RQ.DE drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1F.DE and D6RQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AW1F.DED6RQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.95%

-27.29%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-12.28%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.95%

-27.29%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.16%

+2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-5.73%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

4.28%

-1.78%

Volatility

AW1F.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1F.DE) is 3.62%, while Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that AW1F.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than D6RQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AW1F.DED6RQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

4.42%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.78%

10.83%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

15.27%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

17.83%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

17.57%

-1.70%

AW1F.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1F.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than D6RQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AW1F.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

AW1F.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while D6RQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AW1F.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
D6RQ.DE
Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
0.38%0.53%0.39%0.60%0.80%0.46%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, AW1F.DE and D6RQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AW1F.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AW1F.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.

AW1F.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while D6RQ.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Deka. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for AW1F.DE and 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AW1F.DE and D6RQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer