PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AW1F.DE vs. BBUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AW1F.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1F.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AW1F.DE achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS.DE's 10.42% return.


AW1F.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.23%
YTD
12.99%
6M
13.25%
1Y
26.73%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
10Y*

BBUS.DE

1D
-0.95%
1M
0.29%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.75%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1F.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AW1F.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
12.99%3.65%32.30%24.10%-18.01%12.73%
BBUS.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.42%4.72%32.23%23.42%-15.60%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between AW1F.DE and BBUS.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021

0.99

The correlation between AW1F.DE and BBUS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AW1F.DE vs. BBUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1F.DE
AW1F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AW1F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS.DE
BBUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1F.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1F.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AW1F.DEBBUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.25

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.74

11.22

-0.48

AW1F.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AW1F.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the BBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AW1F.DE and BBUS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AW1F.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1F.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum BBUS.DE drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1F.DE and BBUS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AW1F.DEBBUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.95%

-34.11%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-7.38%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.95%

-23.45%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.01%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-5.30%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.14%

+0.36%

Volatility

AW1F.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1F.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBUS.DE) at 3.43%. This indicates that AW1F.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AW1F.DEBBUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

3.43%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.78%

8.12%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

11.94%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

15.38%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

17.61%

-1.74%

AW1F.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1F.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AW1F.DE vs. BBUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AW1F.DE nor BBUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, AW1F.DE and BBUS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBUS.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for AW1F.DE.

AW1F.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while BBUS.DE tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure. They also come from different issuers: UBS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for AW1F.DE and 0.05% for BBUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AW1F.DE and BBUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer