PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AW1C.DE vs. ZA30.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AW1C.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AW1C.DE achieves a 21.11% return, which is significantly higher than ZA30.DE's 11.16% return.


AW1C.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
10.22%
YTD
21.11%
6M
22.20%
1Y
39.06%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*

ZA30.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
4.14%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.11%
1Y
28.45%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1C.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AW1C.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
21.11%6.94%24.89%24.93%-3.63%
ZA30.DE
iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.16%5.34%31.19%24.10%-5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AW1C.DE and ZA30.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2022

0.92

The correlation between AW1C.DE and ZA30.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AW1C.DE vs. ZA30.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1C.DE
AW1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AW1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ZA30.DE
ZA30.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1C.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AW1C.DEZA30.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

4.12

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

15.63

-11.21

AW1C.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AW1C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AW1C.DE and ZA30.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AW1C.DEZA30.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

2.47

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.18

-0.26

Drawdowns

AW1C.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1C.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, roughly equal to the maximum ZA30.DE drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1C.DE and ZA30.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AW1C.DEZA30.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.40%

-23.45%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-6.91%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.40%

-23.45%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-3.22%

-2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.90%

1.83%

+7.07%

Volatility

AW1C.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) at 2.73%. This indicates that AW1C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZA30.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AW1C.DEZA30.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

2.73%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

7.54%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.24%

11.54%

+13.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

14.38%

+3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

14.38%

+3.73%

AW1C.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ZA30.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AW1C.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AW1C.DE nor ZA30.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AW1C.DE and ZA30.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZA30.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZA30.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AW1C.DE.

AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite, while ZA30.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AW1C.DE and 0.07% for ZA30.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AW1C.DE and ZA30.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer