AW1C.DE vs. UEQU.DE
AW1C.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AW1C.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® ESG Elite, while UEQU.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AW1C.DE returned 15.78%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for UEQU.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AW1C.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UEQU.DE.
Performance
AW1C.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AW1C.DE achieves a 21.11% return, which is significantly lower than UEQU.DE's 25.53% return.
AW1C.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 22.20%
- 1Y
- 39.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- —
UEQU.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 25.53%
- 6M
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 40.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
AW1C.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.11% | 6.94% | 24.89% | 24.93% | -14.50% | 30.17% |
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 25.53% | 6.36% | 13.03% | -8.33% | 20.34% | 25.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AW1C.DE and UEQU.DE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021 | 0.18 |
The correlation between AW1C.DE and UEQU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AW1C.DE vs. UEQU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AW1C.DE
UEQU.DE
AW1C.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AW1C.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.46 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 6.29 | -3.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 15.25 | -10.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AW1C.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.60 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.64 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
AW1C.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AW1C.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, smaller than the maximum UEQU.DE drawdown of -30.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1C.DE and UEQU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AW1C.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.40% | -30.56% | +8.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | -6.50% | -10.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | -15.66% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -22.44% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -1.21% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -8.92% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 2.69% | +6.21% |
Volatility
AW1C.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AW1C.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 3.91% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 13.03% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.24% | 15.73% | +9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 16.83% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 16.41% | +1.70% |
AW1C.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AW1C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UEQU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
AW1C.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AW1C.DE nor UEQU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AW1C.DE and UEQU.DE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AW1C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UEQU.DE.
AW1C.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while UEQU.DE is Commodities. AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite, while UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AW1C.DE and 0.34% for UEQU.DE.
Find the right allocation for AW1C.DE and UEQU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer