AW1C.DE vs. QDVF.DE
AW1C.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - AW1C.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® ESG Elite, while QDVF.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AW1C.DE returned 15.78%/yr vs 21.44%/yr for QDVF.DE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
AW1C.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AW1C.DE achieves a 21.11% return, which is significantly lower than QDVF.DE's 32.71% return.
AW1C.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 22.20%
- 1Y
- 39.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
AW1C.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.11% | 6.94% | 24.89% | 24.93% | -14.50% | 30.17% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 72.13% | 17.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AW1C.DE and QDVF.DE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021 | 0.27 |
The correlation between AW1C.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AW1C.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AW1C.DE
QDVF.DE
AW1C.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AW1C.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.32 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.54 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 7.98 | -3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AW1C.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.82 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.79 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.28 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
AW1C.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AW1C.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1C.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AW1C.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.40% | -65.81% | +43.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | -17.23% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | -27.13% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -27.13% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -8.92% | +8.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -17.41% | +11.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 5.49% | +3.41% |
Volatility
AW1C.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) is 3.81%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that AW1C.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AW1C.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 7.70% | -3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 20.43% | -11.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.24% | 24.05% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 26.95% | -8.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 28.68% | -10.57% |
AW1C.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AW1C.DE and QDVF.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AW1C.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AW1C.DE nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AW1C.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1C.DE and QDVF.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
AW1C.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while QDVF.DE is Energy Equities. AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares.
Find the right allocation for AW1C.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer