AW1C.DE vs. 4UBH.DE
AW1C.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and 4UBH.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AW1C.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® ESG Elite, while 4UBH.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AW1C.DE returned 15.78%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for 4UBH.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AW1C.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for 4UBH.DE.
Performance
AW1C.DE vs. 4UBH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AW1C.DE achieves a 21.11% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBH.DE's 9.92% return.
AW1C.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 22.20%
- 1Y
- 39.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- —
4UBH.DE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- —
AW1C.DE vs. 4UBH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.11% | 6.94% | 24.89% | 24.93% | -14.50% | 30.17% |
4UBH.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 9.92% | 1.56% | 23.21% | 25.08% | -20.30% | 28.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between AW1C.DE and 4UBH.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between AW1C.DE and 4UBH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AW1C.DE vs. 4UBH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AW1C.DE
4UBH.DE
AW1C.DE vs. 4UBH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AW1C.DE | 4UBH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.26 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.85 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 6.41 | -1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AW1C.DE | 4UBH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.43 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.70 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.77 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
AW1C.DE vs. 4UBH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AW1C.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, smaller than the maximum 4UBH.DE drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1C.DE and 4UBH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AW1C.DE | 4UBH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.40% | -23.65% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | -9.61% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | -22.46% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -23.65% | +1.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -6.97% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 2.79% | +6.11% |
Volatility
AW1C.DE vs. 4UBH.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBH.DE) at 3.03%. This indicates that AW1C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AW1C.DE | 4UBH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 3.03% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 9.19% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.24% | 12.45% | +12.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 15.30% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 15.20% | +2.91% |
AW1C.DE vs. 4UBH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AW1C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 4UBH.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AW1C.DE vs. 4UBH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AW1C.DE nor 4UBH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AW1C.DE and 4UBH.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AW1C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for 4UBH.DE.
AW1C.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while 4UBH.DE is Global Equities. AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite, while 4UBH.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AW1C.DE and 0.19% for 4UBH.DE.
Find the right allocation for AW1C.DE and 4UBH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer