AVUV vs. XLK
AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. AVUV is actively managed, while XLK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUV returned 11.57%/yr vs 22.02%/yr for XLK. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
AVUV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 22.73% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.52% return.
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 22.73%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 42.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
AVUV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 22.73% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 13.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUV and XLK is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.52 |
The correlation between AVUV and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AVUV vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUV
XLK
Financial Services
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
AVUV
XLK
-
Energy
AVUV
XLK
Consumer Cyclical
AVUV
XLK
-
Industrials
AVUV
XLK
Technology
AVUV
XLK
Basic Materials
AVUV
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
AVUV
XLK
-
Healthcare
AVUV
XLK
-
Communication Services
AVUV
XLK
-
Real Estate
AVUV
XLK
-
Utilities
AVUV
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
AVUV
XLK
AVUV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVUV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 3.36 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.09 | 10.85 | +4.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVUV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -82.05% | +32.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -15.92% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.79% | -25.66% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -33.56% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.77% | +6.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -34.93% | +27.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 4.92% | -2.25% |
Volatility
AVUV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 4.53%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 10.86% | -6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 18.92% | -7.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 22.55% | -4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 25.18% | -2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.26% | 24.64% | +3.62% |
AVUV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVUV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUV and XLK have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to AVUV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 22.02% vs 11.57% for AVUV. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 22.02% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.
AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUV and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer