AVUV vs. ISVL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and ISVL (iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. AVUV is actively managed, while ISVL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUV returned 11.66%/yr vs 10.47%/yr for ISVL. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ISVL.

Performance

AVUV vs. ISVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly higher than ISVL's 7.25% return.

AVUV

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 2.99%
• YTD: 21.53%
• 6M: 19.38%
• 1Y: 38.52%
• 3Y*: 20.29%
• 5Y*: 11.66%
• 10Y*: —

ISVL

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 6M: 7.19%
• 1Y: 25.94%
• 3Y*: 21.60%
• 5Y*: 10.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUV vs. ISVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF	21.53%	7.44%	9.28%	22.82%	-4.91%	16.91%
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF	7.25%	42.84%	4.58%	17.56%	-13.69%	8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUV and ISVL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021	0.68

The correlation between AVUV and ISVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AVUV vs. ISVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVUV	ISVL
Financial Services	26.1%	21.4%
Consumer Cyclical	18.7%	11.1%
Energy	15.8%	6.0%
Industrials	13.6%	22.1%
Technology	7.4%	4.9%
Basic Materials	5.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	4.8%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	4.7%
Communication Services	3.1%	2.8%
Real Estate	0.7%	10.8%
Utilities	0.1%	1.3%

Return for Risk

AVUV vs. ISVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUV

AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 79
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

ISVL

ISVL Risk / Return Rank: 55
ISVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ISVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ISVL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ISVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
ISVL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUV vs. ISVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVUV	ISVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.76	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	2.51	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.32	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.87	2.09	+2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.43	8.12	+6.30

AVUV vs. ISVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the ISVL Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUV and ISVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVUV vs. ISVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, which is greater than ISVL's maximum drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and ISVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVUV	ISVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.42%	-30.48%	-18.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.95%	-12.48%	+4.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.79%	-12.93%	-15.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.79%	-30.48%	+1.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-3.24%	+2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-6.60%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	3.20%	-0.52%

Volatility

AVUV vs. ISVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 4.28%, while iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVUV	ISVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.28%	4.58%	-0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.40%	12.50%	-1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.62%	14.83%	+2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.64%	16.93%	+5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.21%	16.77%	+11.44%

AVUV vs. ISVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ISVL's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVUV vs. ISVL - Dividend Comparison

AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than ISVL's 3.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF	1.27%	1.58%	1.61%	1.65%	1.74%	1.28%	1.21%	0.38%
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF	3.22%	2.69%	3.92%	3.82%	3.37%	2.82%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVUV and ISVL in my portfolio?

AVUV and ISVL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVUV or ISVL?

ISVL has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to AVUV (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs ISVL's -30.48%.

Which ETF is better, AVUV or ISVL?

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.66% vs 10.47% for ISVL. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVUV or ISVL?

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.66% return vs 10.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVUV or ISVL?

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISVL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVUV or ISVL?

ISVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.27% for AVUV.

What is the main difference between AVUV and ISVL?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.30% for ISVL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.