AVUS vs. VTV
AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. AVUS is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUS returned 13.04%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
AVUS vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUS achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 12.30% return.
AVUS
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
AVUS vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.42% | 16.68% | 20.43% | 21.77% | -13.82% | 28.73% | 17.58% | 8.87% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 12.30% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUS and VTV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between AVUS and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVUS vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUS
VTV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVUS
VTV
Financial Services
AVUS
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
AVUS
VTV
Industrials
AVUS
VTV
Communication Services
AVUS
VTV
Energy
AVUS
VTV
Healthcare
AVUS
VTV
Consumer Defensive
AVUS
VTV
Basic Materials
AVUS
VTV
Utilities
AVUS
VTV
Real Estate
AVUS
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUS vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
AVUS
VTV
AVUS vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 4.15 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.85 | 15.69 | +3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.61 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.81 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.51 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
AVUS vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -59.27% | +22.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -6.35% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -14.52% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -17.04% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | 0.00% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -7.87% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.68% | +0.04% |
Volatility
AVUS vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that AVUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 2.52% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 7.55% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 10.11% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 13.88% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 16.67% | +4.18% |
AVUS vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVUS vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 0.91% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUS and VTV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVUS has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 13.04% vs 11.24% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUS.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.91% for AVUS.
AVUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUS and 0.04% for VTV.
AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUS and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer