PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVTM vs. GSWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVTM vs. GSWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AVTM

1D
-0.65%
1M
5.45%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSWO

1D
-0.71%
1M
4.81%
YTD
11.00%
6M
11.56%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVTM vs. GSWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVTM and GSWO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVTM vs. GSWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVTM

GSWO
GSWO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GSWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GSWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVTM vs. GSWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AVTM vs. GSWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVTMGSWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.88

0.99

+0.89

Drawdowns

AVTM vs. GSWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVTM drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum GSWO drawdown of -17.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVTM and GSWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVTMGSWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-17.77%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.71%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-3.25%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

Volatility

AVTM vs. GSWO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVTMGSWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

10.75%

+5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

12.96%

+2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

12.96%

+2.92%

AVTM vs. GSWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVTM has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than GSWO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVTM vs. GSWO - Dividend Comparison

AVTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than GSWO's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AVTM
Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF
0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSWO
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF
1.61%1.74%1.75%2.06%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, AVTM and GSWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AVTM is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVTM is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSWO.

GSWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AVTM and 0.25% for GSWO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVTM and GSWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer