AVTM vs. GSWO
AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) and GSWO (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AVTM is actively managed, while GSWO is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVTM charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSWO.
Performance
AVTM vs. GSWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVTM
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSWO
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVTM vs. GSWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 9.06% |
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF | 8.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVTM and GSWO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVTM vs. GSWO — Risk / Return Rank
AVTM
GSWO
AVTM vs. GSWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVTM | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.88 | 0.99 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
AVTM vs. GSWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVTM drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum GSWO drawdown of -17.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVTM and GSWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVTM | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -17.77% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.71% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -3.25% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
AVTM vs. GSWO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVTM | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.88% | 10.75% | +5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 12.96% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 12.96% | +2.92% |
AVTM vs. GSWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVTM has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than GSWO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVTM vs. GSWO - Dividend Comparison
AVTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than GSWO's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF | 1.61% | 1.74% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, AVTM and GSWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AVTM is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVTM is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSWO.
GSWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AVTM and 0.25% for GSWO.
Find the right allocation for AVTM and GSWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer