AVTM vs. FYLD
AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVTM charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.
Performance
AVTM vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVTM
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYLD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 6M
- 19.88%
- 1Y
- 39.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
AVTM vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 9.06% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 8.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVTM and FYLD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.51 |
AVTM vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVTM
FYLD
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
AVTM
FYLD
Financial Services
AVTM
FYLD
Industrials
AVTM
FYLD
Consumer Cyclical
AVTM
FYLD
Communication Services
AVTM
FYLD
Healthcare
AVTM
FYLD
-
Energy
AVTM
FYLD
Consumer Defensive
AVTM
FYLD
Basic Materials
AVTM
FYLD
Utilities
AVTM
FYLD
Real Estate
AVTM
FYLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVTM vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
AVTM
FYLD
AVTM vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVTM | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.88 | 0.45 | +1.43 |
Drawdowns
AVTM vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVTM drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVTM and FYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVTM | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -44.55% | +35.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -1.54% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -8.83% | +6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.52% | — |
Volatility
AVTM vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVTM | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.88% | 11.50% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 16.23% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 18.03% | -2.15% |
AVTM vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVTM has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVTM vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
AVTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than FYLD's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.65% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVTM and FYLD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVTM is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVTM is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AVTM and 0.59% for FYLD.
Find the right allocation for AVTM and FYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer