PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVTM vs. AVMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVTM vs. AVMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AVTM

1D
-1.47%
1M
0.51%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVMV

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.57%
YTD
12.90%
6M
11.46%
1Y
25.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVTM vs. AVMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVTM and AVMV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.72

AVTM vs. AVMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVTM
AVMV

Technology

33.8%
9.1%

Financial Services

15.7%
22.4%

Industrials

11.6%
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
18.5%

Communication Services

9.9%
1.6%

Healthcare

6.5%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
7.3%

Energy

3.7%
13.3%

Basic Materials

2.6%
3.9%

Utilities

1.6%
0.6%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.8%

Technology

AVTM
33.8%
AVMV
9.1%

Financial Services

AVTM
15.7%
AVMV
22.4%

Industrials

AVTM
11.6%
AVMV
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AVTM
10.5%
AVMV
18.5%

Communication Services

AVTM
9.9%
AVMV
1.6%

Healthcare

AVTM
6.5%
AVMV
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

AVTM
3.8%
AVMV
7.3%

Energy

AVTM
3.7%
AVMV
13.3%

Basic Materials

AVTM
2.6%
AVMV
3.9%

Utilities

AVTM
1.6%
AVMV
0.6%

Real Estate

AVTM
0.2%
AVMV
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVTM vs. AVMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVTM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AVMV
AVMV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVTM vs. AVMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVTMAVMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.03

AVTM vs. AVMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVTM vs. AVMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVTM drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum AVMV drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVTM and AVMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVTMAVMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-24.24%

+15.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-1.48%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-3.83%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

Volatility

AVTM vs. AVMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVTMAVMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

14.06%

+2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

17.93%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

17.93%

-1.43%

AVTM vs. AVMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVTM has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVTM vs. AVMV - Dividend Comparison

AVTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than AVMV's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
1.32%1.20%1.30%0.25%
AVTM
Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF
0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVTM and AVMV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for AVTM.

AVMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.28% for AVTM.

AVTM is categorized as Global Equities, while AVMV is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AVTM and 0.20% for AVMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVTM and AVMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer