AVSF vs. JABS
AVSF (Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF) and JABS (Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVSF charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for JABS.
Performance
AVSF vs. JABS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVSF achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than JABS's 1.29% return.
AVSF
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- —
JABS
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVSF vs. JABS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVSF Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF | 0.43% | 2.66% |
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 1.29% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVSF and JABS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVSF vs. JABS — Risk / Return Rank
AVSF
JABS
AVSF vs. JABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVSF | JABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.80 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVSF | JABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 2.23 | -1.56 |
Drawdowns
AVSF vs. JABS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVSF drawdown since its inception was -8.85%, which is greater than JABS's maximum drawdown of -0.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVSF and JABS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVSF | JABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -0.97% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.12% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -0.18% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility
AVSF vs. JABS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVSF | JABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88% | 2.00% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 2.00% | +0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.52% | 2.00% | +0.52% |
AVSF vs. JABS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVSF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JABS's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVSF vs. JABS - Dividend Comparison
AVSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than JABS's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVSF Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF | 4.02% | 4.31% | 4.34% | 3.93% | 1.78% | 0.48% | 0.10% |
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.19% | 2.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVSF and JABS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVSF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVSF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for JABS.
JABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 4.02% for AVSF.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVSF and 0.33% for JABS.
Find the right allocation for AVSF and JABS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer