PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVPEX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVPEX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Portfolio (AVPEX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVPEX achieves a -7.84% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 8.80% return.


AVPEX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.15%
YTD
-7.84%
6M
-5.39%
1Y
-6.49%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
8.47%

GQFPX

1D
0.53%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
8.80%
6M
9.02%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVPEX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AVPEX
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Portfolio
-7.84%1.46%18.06%28.80%-28.96%9.59%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
8.80%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AVPEX and GQFPX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between AVPEX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVPEX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVPEX
AVPEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AVPEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVPEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVPEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
AVPEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVPEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVPEX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Portfolio (AVPEX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVPEXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.29

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

2.99

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

8.58

-9.28

AVPEX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVPEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVPEX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVPEXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

1.66

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.82

-0.39

Drawdowns

AVPEX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVPEX drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVPEX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVPEXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.42%

-16.95%

-29.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.41%

-5.24%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.41%

-10.57%

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.43%

-3.93%

-8.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-3.00%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.59%

1.82%

+7.77%

Volatility

AVPEX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Portfolio (AVPEX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.24%. This indicates that AVPEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVPEXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

3.24%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

7.63%

+6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

9.47%

+8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.81%

12.82%

+5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

12.82%

+6.25%

AVPEX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVPEX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVPEX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

AVPEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than GQFPX's 5.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVPEX
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Portfolio
9.22%8.50%8.83%0.00%31.03%4.24%13.52%3.02%6.79%2.33%0.75%0.11%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.87%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVPEX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVPEX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to GQFPX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVPEX dropped -46.42% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVPEX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer