AVOS vs. WAGN
AVOS (Avos Global Equities ETF) and WAGN (Pabrai Wagons ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. AVOS charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for WAGN.
Performance
AVOS vs. WAGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVOS
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAGN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVOS vs. WAGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | -0.19% |
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF | -0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVOS and WAGN is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2026 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVOS vs. WAGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVOS vs. WAGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVOS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, which is greater than WAGN's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVOS and WAGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVOS | WAGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -1.36% | -3.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -1.36% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -0.67% | -0.65% |
Volatility
AVOS vs. WAGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVOS | WAGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 11.23% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 11.23% | +6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 11.23% | +6.39% |
AVOS vs. WAGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVOS has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than WAGN's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVOS vs. WAGN - Dividend Comparison
Neither AVOS nor WAGN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVOS and WAGN have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVOS is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVOS is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for WAGN.
AVOS and WAGN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Avos and Pabrai. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AVOS and 0.90% for WAGN.
Find the right allocation for AVOS and WAGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer