PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVOS vs. UFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVOS vs. UFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AVOS

1D
-0.60%
1M
-1.29%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UFO

1D
-0.11%
1M
-13.10%
6M
-7.76%
YTD
13.03%
1Y
39.43%
3Y*
31.89%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVOS vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
AVOS
Avos Global Equities ETF
8.70%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
-2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between AVOS and UFO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026

0.62

AVOS vs. UFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVOS
UFO

Technology

21.2%
21.0%

Financial Services

18.6%
0.0%

Industrials

11.7%
48.2%

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Communication Services

8.4%
29.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%

-

Energy

7.3%

-

Basic Materials

6.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Utilities

3.0%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

AVOS
21.2%
UFO
21.0%

Financial Services

AVOS
18.6%
UFO
0.0%

Industrials

AVOS
11.7%
UFO
48.2%

Healthcare

AVOS
8.8%
UFO

-

Communication Services

AVOS
8.4%
UFO
29.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AVOS
8.2%
UFO

-

Energy

AVOS
7.3%
UFO

-

Basic Materials

AVOS
6.3%
UFO

-

Consumer Defensive

AVOS
4.7%
UFO

-

Utilities

AVOS
3.0%
UFO

-

Real Estate

AVOS
1.8%
UFO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVOS vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVOS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


UFO
UFO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVOS vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVOSUFODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

AVOS vs. UFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVOS vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVOS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVOS and UFO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVOSUFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-50.33%

+45.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-35.57%

+33.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-21.89%

+20.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.57%

Volatility

AVOS vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVOSUFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.62%

41.86%

-24.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

30.88%

-13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

31.27%

-13.65%

AVOS vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVOS has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVOS vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison

AVOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVOS
Avos Global Equities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
0.34%0.46%1.98%1.90%3.19%1.00%1.07%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVOS and UFO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVOS is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVOS is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.

UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for AVOS.

They also come from different issuers: Avos and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AVOS and 0.75% for UFO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVOS and UFO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer