PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVMU vs. HWSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVMU vs. HWSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF (HWSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMU achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than HWSM's 10.81% return.


AVMU

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.43%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.15%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
1.00%
10Y*

HWSM

1D
0.09%
1M
2.22%
YTD
10.81%
6M
9.51%
1Y
23.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVMU vs. HWSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVMU and HWSM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVMU vs. HWSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMU
AVMU Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AVMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMU Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

HWSM
HWSM Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HWSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HWSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWSM Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMU vs. HWSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF (HWSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVMUHWSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.27

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.33

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.01

7.80

+1.22

AVMU vs. HWSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the HWSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMU and HWSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVMU vs. HWSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMU drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, smaller than the maximum HWSM drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMU and HWSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVMUHWSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.41%

-15.67%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.32%

-10.23%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-1.85%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-2.68%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

3.05%

-2.17%

Volatility

AVMU vs. HWSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) is 0.87%, while Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF (HWSM) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that AVMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVMUHWSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

3.40%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

10.42%

-8.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

15.62%

-12.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.13%

20.32%

-16.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.97%

20.32%

-16.35%

AVMU vs. HWSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSM's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVMU vs. HWSM - Dividend Comparison

AVMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than HWSM's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVMU
Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF
3.48%3.50%3.32%2.50%1.29%0.77%
HWSM
Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value ETF
1.20%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVMU and HWSM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWSM has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to AVMU (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVMU dropped -12.41% vs HWSM's -15.67%.

On 1-year performance, HWSM leads with 23.75% vs 7.95% for AVMU. On fees, AVMU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HWSM has performed better with a 23.75% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVMU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HWSM.

AVMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 1.20% for HWSM.

AVMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HWSM is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Hotchkis & Wiley. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVMU and 0.55% for HWSM.

AVMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVMU and HWSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer