PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVMU vs. AVGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVMU vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMU achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 17.65% return.


AVMU

1D
0.23%
1M
1.50%
YTD
1.96%
6M
2.24%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*

AVGV

1D
0.58%
1M
2.22%
YTD
17.65%
6M
17.54%
1Y
37.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVMU vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVMU
Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF
1.96%3.87%1.72%2.97%
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
17.65%22.57%11.26%11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AVMU and AVGV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVMU vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMU
AVMU Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AVMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGV
AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMU vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVMUAVGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.49

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

4.55

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

17.71

-8.35

AVMU vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the AVGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMU and AVGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVMU vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMU drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, smaller than the maximum AVGV drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMU and AVGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVMUAVGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.41%

-17.03%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.32%

-8.12%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.00%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-2.28%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.08%

-1.20%

Volatility

AVMU vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) is 0.86%, while Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that AVMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVMUAVGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

4.45%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

10.36%

-8.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25%

13.33%

-10.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.13%

15.02%

-10.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.98%

15.02%

-11.04%

AVMU vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVMU vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

AVMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than AVGV's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
2.46%1.98%2.32%1.14%0.00%0.00%
AVMU
Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF
3.48%3.50%3.32%2.50%1.29%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVMU and AVGV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGV has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to AVMU (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVMU dropped -12.41% vs AVGV's -17.03%.

On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 37.24% vs 8.20% for AVMU. On fees, AVMU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 37.24% return vs 8.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVMU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for AVGV.

AVMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 2.46% for AVGV.

AVMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while AVGV is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVMU and 0.26% for AVGV.

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVMU and AVGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer