AVMA vs. PTIN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AVMA (Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF) and PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. AVMA is actively managed, while PTIN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVMA returned 14.03%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for PTIN. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. AVMA charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PTIN.

Performance

AVMA vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMA achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than PTIN's 16.34% return.

AVMA

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: 6.83%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 1Y: 20.31%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.97%

PTIN

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 9.19%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 1Y: 32.43%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: 6.71%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	$728.89K	$743.13K	$593.62K
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	$300.58K	$334.58K	$457.99K

AVMA vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	10.57%	16.72%	10.01%	8.36%
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	16.34%	16.17%	3.36%	3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between AVMA and PTIN is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.82

The correlation between AVMA and PTIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AVMA vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVMA

AVMA Risk / Return Rank: 87
AVMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AVMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
AVMA Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AVMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
AVMA Martin Ratio Rank: 87

PTIN

PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 79
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVMA vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVMA	PTIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.83	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	2.51	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.34	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	2.80	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.79	10.30	+2.49

AVMA vs. PTIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the PTIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMA and PTIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVMA vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMA drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, smaller than the maximum PTIN drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMA and PTIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVMA	PTIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.81%	-21.27%	+9.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.40%	-11.55%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.81%	-13.93%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-2.02%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.52%	-7.56%	+6.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	3.13%	-1.59%

Volatility

AVMA vs. PTIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) is 2.43%, while Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that AVMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVMA	PTIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.43%	5.26%	-2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.67%	15.77%	-8.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.47%	17.72%	-8.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.28%	14.74%	-4.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.28%	14.12%	-3.84%

AVMA vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMA has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVMA vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison

AVMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than PTIN's 2.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	2.02%	2.21%	2.28%	1.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	2.18%	2.53%	2.67%	2.09%	0.41%	2.38%	0.77%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVMA and PTIN in my portfolio?

AVMA and PTIN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVMA or PTIN?

PTIN has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to AVMA (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVMA dropped -11.81% vs PTIN's -21.27%.

Which ETF is better, AVMA or PTIN?

On 3-year performance, AVMA leads with 14.03% vs 12.31% for PTIN. On fees, AVMA is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, AVMA has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVMA or PTIN?

Over the 3-year period, AVMA has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVMA or PTIN?

AVMA is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVMA or PTIN?

PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 2.02% for AVMA.

What is the main difference between AVMA and PTIN?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for AVMA and 0.66% for PTIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.