AVLV vs. DFUV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVLV returned 21.00%/yr vs 18.24%/yr for DFUV. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. AVLV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for DFUV.

Performance

AVLV vs. DFUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly higher than DFUV's 21.09% return.

AVLV

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 2.49%
• 6M: 14.26%
• YTD: 23.60%
• 1Y: 37.90%
• 3Y*: 21.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.98%

DFUV

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 2.13%
• 6M: 14.43%
• YTD: 21.09%
• 1Y: 35.68%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	$110.88M	$105.15M	$154.25M
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	$24.04M	$20.76M	$22.30M

AVLV vs. DFUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	23.60%	15.12%	17.49%	17.43%	-1.36%
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	21.09%	15.77%	11.79%	13.25%	-0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between AVLV and DFUV is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022	0.96

The correlation between AVLV and DFUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVLV vs. DFUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVLV	DFUV
Financial Services	21.5%	22.8%
Technology	16.9%	13.6%
Industrials	15.3%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	14.2%	7.5%
Energy	12.7%	12.1%
Communication Services	6.7%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	3.6%
Healthcare	4.4%	15.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	6.4%
Utilities	0.4%	0.1%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.3%

Return for Risk

AVLV vs. DFUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVLV

AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 96
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 96

DFUV

DFUV Risk / Return Rank: 95
DFUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DFUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
DFUV Omega Ratio Rank: 94
DFUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DFUV Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVLV vs. DFUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVLV	DFUV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	3.01	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	4.18	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.54	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.96	5.97	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.13	22.51	+1.61

AVLV vs. DFUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVLV Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is comparable to the DFUV Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVLV and DFUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVLV vs. DFUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, which is greater than DFUV's maximum drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and DFUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVLV	DFUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.50%	-17.60%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	-6.01%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.50%	-17.60%	-1.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-3.53%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.59%	-0.01%

Volatility

AVLV vs. DFUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is 2.53%, while Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that AVLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVLV	DFUV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	2.72%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	8.67%	+0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.35%	11.92%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.17%	16.12%	+1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.17%	16.12%	+1.05%

AVLV vs. DFUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVLV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DFUV's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVLV vs. DFUV - Dividend Comparison

AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than DFUV's 1.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.05%	1.33%	1.58%	1.85%	2.00%	0.29%
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	1.29%	1.55%	1.64%	1.72%	1.34%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVLV and DFUV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, AVLV and DFUV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVLV or DFUV?

DFUV has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to AVLV (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLV dropped -19.50% vs DFUV's -17.60%.

Which ETF is better, AVLV or DFUV?

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 21.00% vs 18.24% for DFUV. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVLV or DFUV?

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 18.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVLV or DFUV?

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DFUV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVLV or DFUV?

DFUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 1.05% for AVLV.

What is the main difference between AVLV and DFUV?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLV and 0.21% for DFUV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.