AVLC vs. EQL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AVLC (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AVLC is actively managed, while EQL is passively managed. Over the past year, AVLC returned 25.88% vs 18.34% for EQL. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. AVLC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for EQL.

Performance

AVLC vs. EQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVLC achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly higher than EQL's 10.71% return.

AVLC

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 0.03%
• 6M: 10.58%
• YTD: 13.99%
• 1Y: 25.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.95%

EQL

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 14.59%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 12.39%
• ALL TIME*: 13.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	$6.08M	$5.55M	$6.35M
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	$3.33M	$2.84M	$2.70M

AVLC vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	13.99%	17.57%	22.82%	11.76%
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	10.71%	13.09%	16.44%	9.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AVLC and EQL is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.86

The correlation between AVLC and EQL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVLC vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVLC	EQL
Technology	33.9%	10.2%
Financial Services	13.7%	9.1%
Industrials	11.7%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	9.6%
Communication Services	7.8%	8.9%
Healthcare	7.5%	9.4%
Energy	6.2%	8.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	8.8%
Utilities	2.3%	9.4%
Basic Materials	2.2%	8.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	8.7%

Return for Risk

AVLC vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVLC

AVLC Risk / Return Rank: 80
AVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
AVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
AVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 88

EQL

EQL Risk / Return Rank: 79
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVLC vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVLC	EQL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.82	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.54	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	2.78	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	10.89	+2.11

AVLC vs. EQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the EQL Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVLC and EQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVLC vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLC and EQL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVLC	EQL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.64%	-35.65%	+16.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	-6.19%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-0.27%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-3.23%	+1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	1.58%	+0.25%

Volatility

AVLC vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.23%. This indicates that AVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVLC	EQL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	2.23%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.46%	7.03%	+3.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.45%	9.50%	+3.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.68%	14.51%	+1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.68%	16.49%	-0.81%

AVLC vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVLC vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison

AVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than EQL's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	0.82%	0.92%	1.09%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	1.35%	1.73%	1.78%	1.96%	2.14%	1.69%	2.29%	1.95%	2.39%	1.97%	2.89%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVLC and EQL in my portfolio?

AVLC and EQL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVLC or EQL?

AVLC has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to EQL (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLC dropped -19.64% vs EQL's -35.65%.

Which ETF is better, AVLC or EQL?

On 1-year performance, AVLC leads with 25.88% vs 18.34% for EQL. On fees, AVLC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVLC or EQL?

Over the 1-year period, AVLC has performed better with a 25.88% return vs 18.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVLC or EQL?

AVLC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVLC or EQL?

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.82% for AVLC.

What is the main difference between AVLC and EQL?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLC and 0.27% for EQL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.