AVIG vs. FLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVIG (Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF) and FLV (American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVIG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by American Century, while FLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVIG returned 0.13%/yr vs 8.47%/yr for FLV. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVIG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for FLV.

Performance

AVIG vs. FLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG) and American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVIG achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than FLV's 5.79% return.

AVIG

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 0.08%
• 6M: 0.01%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 4.44%
• 5Y*: 0.13%
• 10Y*: —

FLV

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 6.27%
• 1Y: 18.84%
• 3Y*: 13.48%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVIG vs. FLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AVIG Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF	0.08%	7.98%	1.55%	6.41%	-13.94%	-2.15%	0.96%
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF	5.79%	15.80%	11.51%	6.23%	0.94%	17.30%	10.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AVIG and FLV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020	0.16

The correlation between AVIG and FLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AVIG vs. FLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVIG

AVIG Risk / Return Rank: 38
AVIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
AVIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
AVIG Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AVIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
AVIG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

FLV

FLV Risk / Return Rank: 53
FLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FLV Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FLV Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVIG vs. FLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG) and American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVIG	FLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.89	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.81	-0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.51	-0.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	7.88	-2.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVIG vs. FLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the FLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVIG and FLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVIG	FLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	1.89	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.67	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	1.07	-1.09

Drawdowns

AVIG vs. FLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVIG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, which is greater than FLV's maximum drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVIG and FLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVIG	FLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.64%	-15.06%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	-7.53%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.03%	-12.42%	+6.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.47%	-15.06%	-4.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-2.32%	+0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.75%	-2.73%	-5.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	2.40%	-1.48%

Volatility

AVIG vs. FLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG) is 1.32%, while American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) has a volatility of 2.45%. This indicates that AVIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVIG	FLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	2.45%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.85%	7.25%	-4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.85%	10.03%	-6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.23%	12.70%	-6.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.01%	14.25%	-8.24%

AVIG vs. FLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVIG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLV's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVIG vs. FLV - Dividend Comparison

AVIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than FLV's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AVIG Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF	4.04%	4.36%	4.66%	4.06%	2.53%	1.12%	0.22%
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF	1.67%	1.90%	2.07%	2.07%	4.98%	4.05%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVIG and FLV in my portfolio?

AVIG and FLV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVIG or FLV?

FLV has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to AVIG (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVIG dropped -19.64% vs FLV's -15.06%.

Which ETF is better, AVIG or FLV?

On 5-year performance, FLV leads with 8.47% vs 0.13% for AVIG. On fees, AVIG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVIG or FLV?

Over the 5-year period, FLV has performed better with a 8.47% return vs 0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVIG or FLV?

AVIG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for FLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVIG or FLV?

AVIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 1.67% for FLV.

What is the main difference between AVIG and FLV?

AVIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVIG and 0.42% for FLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.