PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVIG vs. BBAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVIG vs. BBAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVIG achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than BBAG's 0.17% return.


AVIG

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.08%
6M
0.01%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*

BBAG

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.02%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVIG vs. BBAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AVIG
Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF
0.08%7.98%1.55%6.41%-13.94%-2.15%0.96%
BBAG
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.17%7.27%1.26%5.41%-13.26%-1.79%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AVIG and BBAG is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

0.96

The correlation between AVIG and BBAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVIG vs. BBAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVIG
AVIG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AVIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AVIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BBAG
BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVIG vs. BBAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVIGBBAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.85

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

5.54

+0.31

AVIG vs. BBAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the BBAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVIG and BBAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVIGBBAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

-0.00

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.32

-0.34

Drawdowns

AVIG vs. BBAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVIG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, roughly equal to the maximum BBAG drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVIG and BBAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVIGBBAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-18.73%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-2.78%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.03%

-6.18%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.47%

-18.06%

-1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-2.84%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-6.22%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.93%

-0.01%

Volatility

AVIG vs. BBAG - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) at 1.24%. This indicates that AVIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVIGBBAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.24%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

2.82%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

3.92%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.23%

5.93%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.01%

5.80%

+0.21%

AVIG vs. BBAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVIG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVIG vs. BBAG - Dividend Comparison

AVIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than BBAG's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVIG
Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF
4.04%4.36%4.66%4.06%2.53%1.12%0.22%0.00%0.00%
BBAG
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.37%4.29%4.25%3.60%2.23%1.44%2.26%2.92%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AVIG and BBAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVIG has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to BBAG (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVIG dropped -19.64% vs BBAG's -18.73%.

On 5-year performance, AVIG leads with 0.13% vs -0.01% for BBAG. On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVIG has performed better with a 0.13% return vs -0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVIG.

BBAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 4.04% for AVIG.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVIG and 0.03% for BBAG.

AVIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVIG and BBAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer