PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVIE vs. KAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVIE vs. KAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF (AVIE) and Scharf ETF (KAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVIE achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than KAT's 0.37% return.


AVIE

1D
0.43%
1M
0.22%
YTD
12.80%
6M
12.98%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
10Y*

KAT

1D
-0.74%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.37%
6M
2.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVIE vs. KAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AVIE
Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF
12.80%7.23%
KAT
Scharf ETF
0.37%0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AVIE and KAT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025

0.53

AVIE vs. KAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVIE
KAT

Energy

30.1%
6.2%

Healthcare

26.3%
22.9%

Consumer Defensive

17.1%
2.1%

Financial Services

15.0%
26.2%

Basic Materials

9.8%
4.2%

Industrials

1.1%
14.4%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Utilities

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
5.1%

Technology

0.1%
12.5%

Communication Services

-

6.3%

Energy

AVIE
30.1%
KAT
6.2%

Healthcare

AVIE
26.3%
KAT
22.9%

Consumer Defensive

AVIE
17.1%
KAT
2.1%

Financial Services

AVIE
15.0%
KAT
26.2%

Basic Materials

AVIE
9.8%
KAT
4.2%

Industrials

AVIE
1.1%
KAT
14.4%

Real Estate

AVIE
0.1%
KAT

-

Utilities

AVIE
0.1%
KAT

-

Consumer Cyclical

AVIE
0.1%
KAT
5.1%

Technology

AVIE
0.1%
KAT
12.5%

Communication Services

AVIE

-

KAT
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVIE vs. KAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVIE
AVIE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AVIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AVIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

KAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVIE vs. KAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF (AVIE) and Scharf ETF (KAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVIEKATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.57

AVIE vs. KAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVIEKATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.17

+0.89

Drawdowns

AVIE vs. KAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVIE drawdown since its inception was -12.39%, which is greater than KAT's maximum drawdown of -9.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVIE and KAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVIEKATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.39%

-9.25%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-4.98%

+3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-3.20%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

Volatility

AVIE vs. KAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVIEKATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

10.48%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.94%

10.48%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

10.48%

+2.46%

AVIE vs. KAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVIE vs. KAT - Dividend Comparison

AVIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while KAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AVIE
Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF
1.45%1.75%1.89%3.72%0.39%
KAT
Scharf ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVIE and KAT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KAT.

AVIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for KAT.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Scharf Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVIE and 0.75% for KAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVIE and KAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer