PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGX vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGX vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGX achieves a 69.89% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 53.29% return.


AVGX

1D
-0.83%
1M
29.49%
YTD
69.89%
6M
35.83%
1Y
156.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTUM

1D
-0.59%
1M
23.63%
YTD
53.29%
6M
50.69%
1Y
95.36%
3Y*
52.22%
5Y*
29.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGX vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVGX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF
69.89%46.98%69.92%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
53.29%36.65%32.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGX and QTUM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024

0.60

The correlation between AVGX and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGX vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGX
AVGX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGX vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVGXQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.55

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

6.28

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

23.69

-17.21

AVGX vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGX and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVGXQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

3.65

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.08

+0.14

Drawdowns

AVGX vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGX drawdown since its inception was -70.97%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGX and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGXQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.97%

-38.45%

-32.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.09%

-15.26%

-38.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.59%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.71%

-8.25%

-14.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.20%

4.04%

+20.16%

Volatility

AVGX vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) has a higher volatility of 23.50% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 9.76%. This indicates that AVGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGXQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.50%

9.76%

+13.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.90%

20.35%

+41.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.97%

26.26%

+59.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.65%

26.56%

+78.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.65%

27.17%

+77.48%

AVGX vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVGX vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

AVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than QTUM's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVGX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF
0.97%1.65%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.70%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVGX and QTUM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGX has higher volatility (23.50%) compared to QTUM (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGX dropped -70.97% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

On 1-year performance, AVGX leads with 156.34% vs 95.36% for QTUM. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 9.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGX has performed better with a 156.34% return vs 95.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AVGX.

AVGX has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.

AVGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AVGX and 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGX and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer