PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGW vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGW achieves a 43.84% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 74.30% return.


AVGW

1D
-1.38%
1M
17.30%
YTD
43.84%
6M
27.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHAT

1D
-0.66%
1M
27.78%
YTD
74.30%
6M
73.13%
1Y
144.01%
3Y*
55.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVGW and CHAT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.60

AVGW vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVGW
CHAT

Technology

33.2%
76.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AVGW
33.2%
CHAT
76.5%

Basic Materials

AVGW

-

CHAT

-

Communication Services

AVGW

-

CHAT
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AVGW

-

CHAT
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

AVGW

-

CHAT

-

Energy

AVGW

-

CHAT

-

Financial Services

AVGW

-

CHAT
0.0%

Healthcare

AVGW

-

CHAT

-

Industrials

AVGW

-

CHAT
0.8%

Real Estate

AVGW

-

CHAT

-

Utilities

AVGW

-

CHAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGW

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AVGW vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVGWCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.69

1.98

-0.29

Drawdowns

AVGW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGW drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGW and CHAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGWCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-31.34%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.66%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.19%

-5.35%

-6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

Volatility

AVGW vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGWCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.65%

30.74%

+22.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.65%

29.90%

+23.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.65%

29.90%

+23.75%

AVGW vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVGW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

AVGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.45%, more than CHAT's 1.64% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVGW and CHAT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AVGW.

AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 44.45%, compared with 1.64% for CHAT.

AVGW is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHAT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AVGW and 0.75% for CHAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGW and CHAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer